Karl Malone>>Westbrook
I completely agree. Malone probably ranks #1 when we factor in consistency, peak value, longevity etc.
That being said, does anyone else agree that Barkley would translate better into the modern era? He was insanely efficient, super athletic, and deadly as a one man fast break. It's unfortunate that his athletic peak coincided with a mediocre supporting cast in Philly.
We all know that Barkley lacked focus and commitment to defense until he had a great supporting cast in Phoenix. Still, I think he would be a top 5 player in the NBA under the right conditions.