so what does the cavs starting lineup look like now? I don't see how that team makes the playoffs.
C - Thompson
PF - Love
SF - Hood / if resigned ?
SG - JR Smith?
PG - Hill
btw George Hill - $19 mil / Thompson $17 mil / JR Smith $14.7 mil. I guess the cap space has to go somewhere, but I didn't realize they were spending that much on those 3.
Cavs actually have a fairly deep team, though lack the top end talent. They are also a veteran team. That type of team often grinds out victories and over performs in the regular season.
C - Thompson, Zizic
PF - Love, Nance, Frye
SF - Hood, Osman
SG - Hill, Smith, Korver
PG - Sexton, Clarkson
That team could pretty easily beat out Detroit and Charlotte for the 8th seed.
Having a rookie as your starting PG is a good way to rack up a lot of losses. I don't expect them to make the playoffs.
Sorta? Hill is very much capable of being the primary ball handler/decision maker, so they can ease Sexton into a primary role while still helping him gain experience. Also, Sexton is really good and was my non-Doncic pick for ROY.
The East is very weak. While the top 3 teams might be in the 2-5 range league wide behind Golden State, arguably the next 8 teams are all out west, and I bet two sub-.500 teams make it into the playoffs from this conference. The Cavs could easily be one, despite breaking in a rookie PG.
tazzmaniac is correct that lottery-drafted rookie point guards are typically terrible in their first season. They might provide some empty stats, but don't help teams win. If he's playing 20+mpg at point (which seems to be expected), then I too would expect the losses to pile up.
Here are all the those players through 2013: Lonzo, Dennis Smith Jr, Fox, Kris Dunn, Jamal Murray, DA Russell, Marcus Smart, Elfrid Payton, Trey Burke, Michael Carter Williams. Not one of them played very good basketball in their rookie season since Damian Lilliard in 2012 (who had played 4 years of college ball).
And of those, only Smart played next to a veteran PG for a lot of his minutes on the floor, which is what will most likely happen with Sexton. Smart was fine his rookie year, as he was not given more than he could handle, and the Celtics went on to the playoffs as a sub-.500 club, similar to what I’m suggesting the Cavs could do.
Again, the East is terrible at the bottom and mediocre in the middle. Atlanta, Chicago, and New York aren’t going to try. Brooklyn probably isn’t either, finally giving themselves a chance at a lottery pick entering a summer of significant cap room, and Orlando has no clue. The Cavs floor seems to be 10th in the conference by default, and none of Detroit, Charlotte, or Miami are terribly inspiring. The Cavs arent going to win because of Sexton, but they can probably scheme not to lose because of him also, giving him a chance to get smaller doses of experience than the bowlsful thrown at the players you mentioned, most of whom did not develop well in the following seasons.