The trade idea seems extremely risky....and therefore irresponsible, which makes it repugnant.
However, just as the rich use money to make money, the Celtics, who are so rich in talent, might use that talent to get even richer...talent-wise. I say this since no one here on Celtics blog has any ability to say with surety (?...is that a word) that Bamba won't help this team more than Brown, given his unique stature. What I mean is let's say we had both Jaylen and Bamba, and they seemed to be having about an equal effect on the Celtics' winning...would you then rather replace Brown with Mikal Bridges, or Bamba with _______? See? Harder to think of a Bamba replacement (please don't say Noel...ugh..cough...puke). Brown for Bamba is a big risk, but something you wait and see on before crucifying anyone. Oh heck go ahead and crucify...then you can apologize later if needed.
In any case, when you have a great minded young intellectual basketball player (Brown) on your team and you covet another supposed intellectual smarty pants (Bamba), you do your best to combine them, so that they can play chess with their whisky and wine on team flights, verbally spar with Brad, play connect 4 with Rondo at Pizzeria Uno after Pelican Celtic contests, give speeches at Harvard, and deal with Joel Embiid's trash talk in some manner that I cannot fathom.
TP to OP.