Author Topic: C's Finish With 8 Players Averaging Double Figures  (Read 3002 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

C's Finish With 8 Players Averaging Double Figures
« on: April 12, 2018, 09:12:28 AM »

Offline Big333223

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7508
  • Tommy Points: 742
One of those players is Greg Monroe who only played 26 games for Boston but that's still a pretty impressive number.

Removing Kyrie, there are 7 players averaging between 10.2 and 14.5 ppg.
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008

Re: C's Finish With 8 Players Averaging Double Figures
« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2018, 10:34:38 AM »

Offline More Banners

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3845
  • Tommy Points: 257
Jeez. As soon as I saw the title here, I had a flashback to those Walker/Pierce teams where only 2 players scored consistently.

We've come such a long way. Thank goodness.

Re: C's Finish With 8 Players Averaging Double Figures
« Reply #2 on: April 12, 2018, 10:38:30 AM »

Offline Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31055
  • Tommy Points: 1615
  • What a Pub Should Be
Better than watching a couple of gunners and everyone else standing around.


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: C's Finish With 8 Players Averaging Double Figures
« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2018, 11:14:46 AM »

Offline More Banners

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3845
  • Tommy Points: 257
Better than watching a couple of gunners and everyone else standing around.

Oh, the style of play is so, so much better since the ISO and illegal defense era. That sucked. The lack of ball movement, few passes per possession, and taking turns playing ISO... it was a bad time for basketball even as it made individual stars more marketable.

Wow. I guess I can't say enough bad things about that '95-'05 or so period.

Re: C's Finish With 8 Players Averaging Double Figures
« Reply #4 on: April 12, 2018, 01:49:33 PM »

Offline ImShakHeIsShaq

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7739
  • Tommy Points: 804
Yep, just goes to show, these kids stepped up big time! All they cared about was winning because JB and JT surely could have been a lot more selfish! Let's hope it carries over to the big stage!
It takes me 3hrs to get to Miami and 1hr to get to Orlando... but I *SPIT* on their NBA teams! "Bless God and bless the (Celts)"-Lady GaGa (she said gays but she really meant Celts)

Re: C's Finish With 8 Players Averaging Double Figures
« Reply #5 on: April 14, 2018, 06:19:38 PM »

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33617
  • Tommy Points: 1544
This only happened because there were so many injuries.  I mean if Hayward and Irving each played 70+ games, they would have likely only been joined by Horford, Brown, and then probably Tatum or Morris (with an outside shot at both of them).  No way Smart or Rozier gets there and Monroe isn't on the team. 
2023 Historical Draft - Brooklyn Nets - 9th pick

Bigs - Pau, Amar'e, Issel, McGinnis, Roundfield
Wings - Dantley, Bowen, J. Jackson
Guards - Cheeks, Petrovic, Buse, Rip

Re: C's Finish With 8 Players Averaging Double Figures
« Reply #6 on: April 15, 2018, 10:35:39 AM »

Offline droopdog7

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6974
  • Tommy Points: 466
I’d rather have two players average 50 than eight players average 10 each.

Re: C's Finish With 8 Players Averaging Double Figures
« Reply #7 on: April 15, 2018, 11:30:25 AM »

Offline incoherent

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1855
  • Tommy Points: 278
  • 7 + 11 = 18
I’d rather have two players average 50 than eight players average 10 each.

I would also rather have 100 points instead of 80.