Do you consider the Warriors to be a dynasty? (poll)

[Roy H.]

In the way that it's used now, yes.  The Cowboys of the early 90s are considered a dynasty, etc.

But they're not in the same category as the Celtics, Canadiens, Yankees, etc.  They're not even with the Steelers, Oilers, 49ers, Pats, etc.  You need dominance and longevity, and four years just isn't enough.

But, I have no doubt they'll hang another couple of banners.

[Eja117]

Nope.

When I was a kid when figuring out a game the majority of the time the two best kids would pick teams and they'd pick the next best down and then the next and then the next.

Now they'd try to figure out how to get the best 4 kids on the same team, win 4 games, and call it a dynasty.

You're not a dynasty. You're lazy