Total Members Voted: 62
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: droopdog7 on April 06, 2018, 09:16:22 PMI remember when people were excited about nadar. I look forward to reading a similar thread about Byrd in the future.Don't count on it.Bird is a much better player than Nader and has been all along.
I remember when people were excited about nadar. I look forward to reading a similar thread about Byrd in the future.
Whether Nader is sitting at the end of the bench in the playoffs or Bird, isn't going to make a difference in how far this team goes in the playoffs. So to me, just let Nader finish the season on the squad and Bird can try to take his place on the end of the bench next year.
After missing nearly two months with a back injury, rookie Jabari Bird has impressed the organization with his recent play, yet placing him on the playoff roster would require a series of difficult decisions that the club would have to execute in the next few days.Bird is on a two-way contract that’s tied mostly to the G-League, meaning he is not eligible for the playoffs. Only players on full NBA deals can participate in the postseason. So the Celtics would have to sign Bird to a full NBA contract.Secondly, the club would have to make a subsequent roster move to make room for Bird on the 15-man roster, meaning they would have to waive a player such as Abdel Nader.Bird, who has scored 24 points in the past two games, including 9 in the Celtics’ 112-106 loss to Atlanta on Sunday, has flourished with his athleticism, cutting to the basket, and defense. He could have made more of a contribution during the regular season buta back injury robbed him of an opportunity, until now............................................With the Celtics being shorthanded on guards with Kyrie Irving and Marcus Smart out, Bird could provide depth, but the Celtics would have to cut another player.For example, the Golden State Warriors added Quinn Cook to their roster for backcourt depth but had to waive veteran Omri Casspi on Saturday to execute the move.“Those aren’t my discussions or my job, so I don’t really get into that. But at the end of the day, I think he is playing well,” Celtics coach Brad Stevens said of Bird. “He’s doing some good things. I thought offensively he was pretty good, especially early. Everybody’s going to be a little bit better when you’re younger and when you’re in for the first time when you’re not at the end, like they were when they were more featured. When they can play off of the other guys. And so I think that he’s done a good job in the last couple of games, and will probably play some of the next two.”Because Bird’s two-way contract is for one year — most are generally for two-year terms – he is a restricted free agent this summer and could draw offers from other clubs. The Celtics, if they submit a qualifying offer to Bird, would have the right to match any offer, but Bird, because of his potential, could draw a contract too expensive for the Celtics to match.Signing Bird to a multiyear deal now would eliminate his status as a restricted free agent, but again, it would require another player on the roster to be waived.
Quote from: mr. dee on April 06, 2018, 09:39:07 PMNo. As better as Bird is compared to Nader, it would be a waste of contract if you signed him full time this year. Better sign him next year full time for cap flexibility.Quote from: nickagneta on April 06, 2018, 09:34:48 PMWhether Nader is sitting at the end of the bench in the playoffs or Bird, isn't going to make a difference in how far this team goes in the playoffs. So to me, just let Nader finish the season on the squad and Bird can try to take his place on the end of the bench next year.TP to both you guys for the pragmatism and salience.Don’t like Nader, but both regarding goodwill with his agent and others as well as the not rocking the boat angle, I get it.
No. As better as Bird is compared to Nader, it would be a waste of contract if you signed him full time this year. Better sign him next year full time for cap flexibility.
I don't think it matters, because a) if the Celtics were to be in the position of needing Bird in the playoffs, they're not going far anyway, and b) he probably wouldn't fare too well against top competition.
Quote from: rocknrollforyoursoul on April 10, 2018, 01:27:08 PMI don't think it matters, because a) if the Celtics were to be in the position of needing Bird in the playoffs, they're not going far anyway, and b) he probably wouldn't fare too well against top competition.Playoffs are a big money maker for teamsGetting past the first round guarantees 2 extra home games = lots of $$$