LeBron might surpass Jordan's career through longevity (he could be the only 40k-10k-10k player EVER), but the fact of the matter is that he has yet to match Jordan's 6-year peak, despite constantly bragging about his greatness.
So because he might only be a top 4 player of all time, he should just shut up?
Until somebody surpasses Jordan's dominance of winning 6 titles in 8 seasons, should no player ever be allowed to talk about how dominant they are over their current league? A guy who has been to seven straight NBA Finals hasn't been dominant enough to talk about how he's not concerned about getting back to the Finals again?
What a boring league some of you guys want.
That's not at all what I said, and it's actually the opposite of what I believe.
I love LeBron's confidence. It is something very rarely seen in basketball (or America) these days. He takes pride in his craft, and he's not afraid to let people know about it. That's wonderful. It sets a standard of excellence which he has to push for. It makes the NBA more entertaining to follow. It helps promote sports cars, movies, important social causes, and basketball cards, which I collect (only basketball cards lol). It's made him a household name.
But, with big words comes big backlash. If LeBron wants to say he'll drop 50 on the next team he faces and he drops 10, should we not be allowed to make fun of him because he's "already secured his legacy and Nike promoted his comments way too much?" When he says he wants to surpass Jordan but then backtracks (remember his "Well I've already secured my legacy, so I don't care how this Finals goes" comment before the Finals?), should we not be allowed to mention that just because his counting stats are reaching Jordan's career numbers? When LeBron wants to talk about how dominant he is, can we not bring up that he has not dominated the 2010s like the Warriors have? LeBron sometimes comes off like he wants to convince everyone of how good he is, and it feels like he is compensating for something. He's going to be the greatest of all time on paper, but he's doing it slow-and-steady. And he wants the glory of a decade of dominance which he has not had. Is it out of our ability to point that out?
To suggest that poor, 33-year-old LeBron should not (cannot?) receive backlash when he fails to live up to the expectations he publicly sets for himself is silly. The "the media started it 15 years ago, so anything he says after that is because of big, bad Nike and Sports Illustrated" excuse is very poor. He is an intelligent man who has been in the spotlight for over half his life now. His "I'm so good" persona was and is a calulated risk that has yielded significantly more rewards than pitfalls. So when Lebron is asked about how his team (The Cavailers) would react to not having home court and he only responds with first-person pronouns (well
I don't care because
I'm good enough to give anyone problems anywhere), darn right we can give him crap for it. When Jordan said stuff like this, everyone shut up and agreed because he was
that good.
Basically, LeBron has not reached the level of dominance that warrants the "shut up, he's too good to fall short" reasoning yet, and the "he doesn't want the attention, it's the 'hype machine' doing it all" excuse holds no water.