No chance we beat the Warriors without Hayward --> No need to waste trade assets on a rental.
Thanks, but no thanks.
For what ever reason we are one of the few teams that plays them very well. We almost pulled that off with out Smart to help on Curry and Thompson and Curry had to go off for 49 to win. Evans gives us good D and would give us much needed offense. So it would give us a chance.
Plus who said it would be a rental. Might be able to resign him, especially if Smarts on his way out.
No chance we beat the Warriors in a 7 game series without Hayward --> No need to waste trade assets on a rental.
Sound fair enough now?
Regarding your second point :
Evans signed a 1 year deal with Memphis this past summer for $3.29m, meaning if we acquire him we will only have Non-Bird Right's, which would allow us to go over the cap to re-sign him to a contract of 120% of his previous contract, or $3.948m. We could also use the MLE to re-sign Evans, but even the Non-Taxpayer MLE will only be roughly $8.5m, and we'll likely only have the lesser Taxpayer MLE available, which is only good for about $5m.
You so absolute on this. Of course there is a chance with a couple moves. 1st round pick for Evans, and then DPE for Monroe.
Plus DA most likely will go after him if he knows he has the ability to resign. I'm sure there is a way. And even if there wasn't, a late first round for Evans for 6 months is fine. Some times you roll the dice and take chances.
Sorry, I didn't mean to sound absolute. All I'm saying is that imo we aren't ready yet.
Tatum is 19.
Brown is 21 (in his second year in the league).
Hayward is out for the season.
Meanwhile, the Warriors might be the best team in NBA history. They have 4 all-stars and 2 MVPs. Curry had to go off for 49 for them to win? Well, they have 3 players who can score 20+ points pretty much at will. Next time it will be KD. The time after that it will be Klay... Realistically speaking, I don't think we can beat them in a 7 game series.
Of course that's just my opinion. I totally see your point of view.