The problem is, if we trade 2018 Boston First, and the Lakers Pick doesn't convey, then we have ZERO first round draft picks for 2018 (WELP).
Might be why Ainge will be hesitant to make a trade and will instead look at the bought out players later on.
Why would losing a late 1st be a big deal? I don't get it. We don't need to have a 1st every year, especially one in the 25-30 range.
Exactly It may be a good thing for a year. We are overflowing with prospects, especially late 1st/second round pick prospects with guaranteed money. We don't need any more if we hope to contend the next few years.
It's a deep draft overall with a lot of intriguing names.
Don't forget, we also don't have a 2nd rounder I believe because if it lands 56-60, it goes elsewhere (I think OKC? Or Memphis)
I mean, dang, potentially not having a draft pick in this upcoming draft??
I think we could survive a year with out a pick. Unless trades happen, next year we would still have Smart,Brown,Tatum,Rozier,Theis,Yabu,Nader,Semi,Allen,Bird for our 25 and under guys. It would be worth the late for Evans, especially if we can sign him on the cheap next season. Good Defender and can score and move the ball. He's still only 28, so he has a good 5 years left.
I wonder if this has to do with Smart punching the picture frame and while they had to "investigate" it. Can't tell people that they told him he could be traded to the Griz.