Total Members Voted: 39
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: csfansince60s on January 23, 2018, 10:06:25 PMQuote from: saltlover on January 23, 2018, 10:03:16 PMQuote from: kozlodoev on January 23, 2018, 10:00:27 PMQuote from: jpotter33 on January 23, 2018, 09:43:03 PMIf we could snag Skal for them to clear room for a trade, that’d be sick. That kid still has a ton of potential, and we’re kind of lacking in young bigs, too.Hell, I’d give up that LAC pick abd the DPE for him easily!He's under contract for 3 years though, so he can't be had for the DPE.True, but he can be had for Nader.True, but I think they want to do a two for one to clear the roster spot. So if it's both Skal and Richardson, it'd have to be Yabs or Rozier.Missed that part. Maybe they can convince Garrett Temple to decline his player option to be traded to a title contender. Getting out from that should be worth something to SAC. So Nader for Skal and DPE and cash for Temple.
Quote from: saltlover on January 23, 2018, 10:03:16 PMQuote from: kozlodoev on January 23, 2018, 10:00:27 PMQuote from: jpotter33 on January 23, 2018, 09:43:03 PMIf we could snag Skal for them to clear room for a trade, that’d be sick. That kid still has a ton of potential, and we’re kind of lacking in young bigs, too.Hell, I’d give up that LAC pick abd the DPE for him easily!He's under contract for 3 years though, so he can't be had for the DPE.True, but he can be had for Nader.True, but I think they want to do a two for one to clear the roster spot. So if it's both Skal and Richardson, it'd have to be Yabs or Rozier.
Quote from: kozlodoev on January 23, 2018, 10:00:27 PMQuote from: jpotter33 on January 23, 2018, 09:43:03 PMIf we could snag Skal for them to clear room for a trade, that’d be sick. That kid still has a ton of potential, and we’re kind of lacking in young bigs, too.Hell, I’d give up that LAC pick abd the DPE for him easily!He's under contract for 3 years though, so he can't be had for the DPE.True, but he can be had for Nader.
Quote from: jpotter33 on January 23, 2018, 09:43:03 PMIf we could snag Skal for them to clear room for a trade, that’d be sick. That kid still has a ton of potential, and we’re kind of lacking in young bigs, too.Hell, I’d give up that LAC pick abd the DPE for him easily!He's under contract for 3 years though, so he can't be had for the DPE.
If we could snag Skal for them to clear room for a trade, that’d be sick. That kid still has a ton of potential, and we’re kind of lacking in young bigs, too.Hell, I’d give up that LAC pick abd the DPE for him easily!
Quote from: saltlover on January 23, 2018, 10:03:16 PMQuote from: kozlodoev on January 23, 2018, 10:00:27 PMQuote from: jpotter33 on January 23, 2018, 09:43:03 PMIf we could snag Skal for them to clear room for a trade, that’d be sick. That kid still has a ton of potential, and we’re kind of lacking in young bigs, too.Hell, I’d give up that LAC pick abd the DPE for him easily!He's under contract for 3 years though, so he can't be had for the DPE.True, but he can be had for Nader.However, Sacto want roster spots, so that trade doesn't help them.
Quote from: kozlodoev on January 23, 2018, 10:37:39 PMQuote from: saltlover on January 23, 2018, 10:03:16 PMQuote from: kozlodoev on January 23, 2018, 10:00:27 PMQuote from: jpotter33 on January 23, 2018, 09:43:03 PMIf we could snag Skal for them to clear room for a trade, that’d be sick. That kid still has a ton of potential, and we’re kind of lacking in young bigs, too.Hell, I’d give up that LAC pick abd the DPE for him easily!He's under contract for 3 years though, so he can't be had for the DPE.True, but he can be had for Nader.However, Sacto want roster spots, so that trade doesn't help them.They can do that trade first and then waive Nader creating a roster spot. Though I got the impression they wanted actual value for Richardson or Skal, such that Nader and cash (for waiving) wouldn't be enough. They probably want at least a 1st back and frankly I might do it for Boston's 1st this year. Nader, BOS 1st, cash for Skal works for me.
On a related note, didn't SAC just announce to the world that they are going to start playing young players a lot more and sitting veterans? I guess Skal doesn't pass the test of young player worth playing(?).
Quote from: Moranis on January 24, 2018, 08:27:19 AMQuote from: kozlodoev on January 23, 2018, 10:37:39 PMQuote from: saltlover on January 23, 2018, 10:03:16 PMQuote from: kozlodoev on January 23, 2018, 10:00:27 PMQuote from: jpotter33 on January 23, 2018, 09:43:03 PMIf we could snag Skal for them to clear room for a trade, that’d be sick. That kid still has a ton of potential, and we’re kind of lacking in young bigs, too.Hell, I’d give up that LAC pick abd the DPE for him easily!He's under contract for 3 years though, so he can't be had for the DPE.True, but he can be had for Nader.However, Sacto want roster spots, so that trade doesn't help them.They can do that trade first and then waive Nader creating a roster spot. Though I got the impression they wanted actual value for Richardson or Skal, such that Nader and cash (for waiving) wouldn't be enough. They probably want at least a 1st back and frankly I might do it for Boston's 1st this year. Nader, BOS 1st, cash for Skal works for me. One doesn't preclude the other. And I suspect the idea is to move them for someone who is expiring, so that they don't have to eat multiple years of their salary when waiving them, as a minimum. Like Skal and Richardson, Nader is on the book for multiple years.
Quote from: kozlodoev on January 24, 2018, 08:41:27 AMQuote from: Moranis on January 24, 2018, 08:27:19 AMQuote from: kozlodoev on January 23, 2018, 10:37:39 PMQuote from: saltlover on January 23, 2018, 10:03:16 PMQuote from: kozlodoev on January 23, 2018, 10:00:27 PMQuote from: jpotter33 on January 23, 2018, 09:43:03 PMIf we could snag Skal for them to clear room for a trade, that’d be sick. That kid still has a ton of potential, and we’re kind of lacking in young bigs, too.Hell, I’d give up that LAC pick abd the DPE for him easily!He's under contract for 3 years though, so he can't be had for the DPE.True, but he can be had for Nader.However, Sacto want roster spots, so that trade doesn't help them.They can do that trade first and then waive Nader creating a roster spot. Though I got the impression they wanted actual value for Richardson or Skal, such that Nader and cash (for waiving) wouldn't be enough. They probably want at least a 1st back and frankly I might do it for Boston's 1st this year. Nader, BOS 1st, cash for Skal works for me. One doesn't preclude the other. And I suspect the idea is to move them for someone who is expiring, so that they don't have to eat multiple years of their salary when waiving them, as a minimum. Like Skal and Richardson, Nader is on the book for multiple years.Nader is only partially guaranteed this summer (and obviously the following years). The guarantee is 450k. So the rest of this season and the buy out is right around a million dollars. It is pretty easy to eat that. Semi and Theis are also only partially guaranteed, but they are better than Nader and wouldn't make sense to trade in that type of scenario.
Quote from: Moranis on January 24, 2018, 09:19:57 AMQuote from: kozlodoev on January 24, 2018, 08:41:27 AMQuote from: Moranis on January 24, 2018, 08:27:19 AMQuote from: kozlodoev on January 23, 2018, 10:37:39 PMQuote from: saltlover on January 23, 2018, 10:03:16 PMQuote from: kozlodoev on January 23, 2018, 10:00:27 PMQuote from: jpotter33 on January 23, 2018, 09:43:03 PMIf we could snag Skal for them to clear room for a trade, that’d be sick. That kid still has a ton of potential, and we’re kind of lacking in young bigs, too.Hell, I’d give up that LAC pick abd the DPE for him easily!He's under contract for 3 years though, so he can't be had for the DPE.True, but he can be had for Nader.However, Sacto want roster spots, so that trade doesn't help them.They can do that trade first and then waive Nader creating a roster spot. Though I got the impression they wanted actual value for Richardson or Skal, such that Nader and cash (for waiving) wouldn't be enough. They probably want at least a 1st back and frankly I might do it for Boston's 1st this year. Nader, BOS 1st, cash for Skal works for me. One doesn't preclude the other. And I suspect the idea is to move them for someone who is expiring, so that they don't have to eat multiple years of their salary when waiving them, as a minimum. Like Skal and Richardson, Nader is on the book for multiple years.Nader is only partially guaranteed this summer (and obviously the following years). The guarantee is 450k. So the rest of this season and the buy out is right around a million dollars. It is pretty easy to eat that. Semi and Theis are also only partially guaranteed, but they are better than Nader and wouldn't make sense to trade in that type of scenario.As someone who wanted to draft Skal (twice) I’d love it if we explored options to acquire him for cheap.
Maybe it's just me, but if our DPE is used up on Channing Frye, I'll be disappointed.
Maybe it's just me, but if our DPE is used up on Channing Frye, I'll be disappointed. Yes, we could also get back Skal (by trading Nader or Yabu), but what will REALLY help us in the playoffs is someone like Greg Monroe, Tyreke Evans or Tyson Chandler. NOT Frye.