Since this is sort of a slow C news day...
My starting premise is that the C's will choose not to afford both TR and MS in 2 years. I like TR a lot and could make the argument that MS should go. But for purposes of this post I am going to assume that C's will go with the cheaper player (MS 8 mil/yr vs TR currently playing his way up to 15 mil/yr and perhaps beyond).
So if C's have committed to KI, JB, and MS in the back court ... and TR has said he would like to start, C might consider dealing an area of surplus for an area of need: a young big
I love Al and Daniel a lot. I am not sold on bringing either Aron or Greg back. I don't think Ed Davis from Portland is the answer either.
Why Indiana does it: Long term are they going to be able to keep both DS and MT and keep them both happy? Their current PG's are D Collison (salary not guaranteed next year, 30 years old) and C Joesph. TR is a good upgrade for Pacers. (of course C's would need to sweeten the deal to get M Turner from Indiana)
In 2 or 3 years, would C's rather spend 15 million a year on a starting center (Sabonis) or a back up point guard (TR)?
I also like Skal L in Sacramento, but not sure Kings would readily part with him, plus they seem set at PG with Fox and Mason.
Ok - let me have it!