Author Topic: Carmelo ejected for flagrant 2  (Read 2299 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Carmelo ejected for flagrant 2
« on: November 06, 2017, 02:43:22 AM »

Offline CelticsElite

  • NCE
  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10774
  • Tommy Points: 789
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/21309298/oklahoma-city-thunder-carmelo-anthony-puzzled-being-ejected-loss-portland-trail-blazers

Mere 2 days after westbrook slaps jaylen brown in a jump ball : "It's nonsense, man," Westbrook said of the ejection. "It don't make any sense."


Re: Carmelo ejected for flagrant 2
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2017, 03:26:22 AM »

Offline kiwiceltic

  • Sam Hauser
  • Posts: 159
  • Tommy Points: 16
A friend of mine was just talking about this. Horrible call, yes Melo initiated the contact, but he was not intentionally looking to connect with Nurkic's face.

Re: Carmelo ejected for flagrant 2
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2017, 04:26:54 AM »

Offline playdream

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1665
  • Tommy Points: 88
It's the right call
Melo didn't need to make that contact at first place, he can just score, instead he choose to make the contact with his elbows

Re: Carmelo ejected for flagrant 2
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2017, 05:26:29 AM »

Offline CelticD

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1201
  • Tommy Points: 140
He used his elbows as a shield and accidentally made face contact. I'd give it a flagrant 1, I don't think it was intentional.

Re: Carmelo ejected for flagrant 2
« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2017, 06:24:31 AM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 58684
  • Tommy Points: -25629
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
That should be, at worst, an offensive foul. There’s no intent there, and he was attempting to make a basketball play.

Does anyone think Carmelo was doing anything other than trying to score?


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Re: Carmelo ejected for flagrant 2
« Reply #5 on: November 06, 2017, 06:27:16 AM »

Offline A Future of Stevens

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2533
  • Tommy Points: 486
There was no intent. I don't really understand the rules anymore.
#JKJB

Re: Carmelo ejected for flagrant 2
« Reply #6 on: November 06, 2017, 06:27:17 AM »

Offline mr. dee

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7839
  • Tommy Points: 597
NBA has really turned into creampuff league.

Re: Carmelo ejected for flagrant 2
« Reply #7 on: November 06, 2017, 06:48:42 AM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12578
  • Tommy Points: 2156
OKC unraveling over a few calls. Good stuff
The only color that matters is GREEN

Re: Carmelo ejected for flagrant 2
« Reply #8 on: November 06, 2017, 06:49:41 AM »

Offline yelkao

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 273
  • Tommy Points: 17
That’s the weakest thing I’ve ever seen. Not a Melo fan at all, but that is so soft and makes little sense.

Re: Carmelo ejected for flagrant 2
« Reply #9 on: November 06, 2017, 06:52:57 AM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12578
  • Tommy Points: 2156
I thought Melo did it on purpose or without regard for Nurkic’s safety.
The only color that matters is GREEN

Re: Carmelo ejected for flagrant 2
« Reply #10 on: November 06, 2017, 07:14:56 AM »

Online hpantazo

  • Kevin McHale
  • ************************
  • Posts: 24898
  • Tommy Points: 2700
That should be, at worst, an offensive foul. There’s no intent there, and he was attempting to make a basketball play.

Does anyone think Carmelo was doing anything other than trying to score?

Agreed. The wussification of the NBA continues

Re: Carmelo ejected for flagrant 2
« Reply #11 on: November 06, 2017, 07:26:38 AM »

Offline Big333223

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7500
  • Tommy Points: 742
I don't know if it's a flagrant 2 but it's probably, at least, a flagrant 1. Especially if you watch it from the overheard angle, you can see really clearly that Melo is not jumping toward the basket at all, he's jumping into Nurkic on purpose. That's not uncommon (IT and Harden and many others have made a career of it) but rather than turn his body away from Nurkic, toward the rim (as one would do when one is trying to score) he actually turns his body away from the basket.

To the ref's point, it does look pretty unnatural to me.
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008

Re: Carmelo ejected for flagrant 2
« Reply #12 on: November 06, 2017, 07:33:29 AM »

Online hpantazo

  • Kevin McHale
  • ************************
  • Posts: 24898
  • Tommy Points: 2700
I don't know if it's a flagrant 2 but it's probably, at least, a flagrant 1. Especially if you watch it from the overheard angle, you can see really clearly that Melo is not jumping toward the basket at all, he's jumping into Nurkic on purpose. That's not uncommon (IT and Harden and many others have made a career of it) but rather than turn his body away from Nurkic, toward the rim (as one would do when one is trying to score) he actually turns his body away from the basket.

To the ref's point, it does look pretty unnatural to me.

That’s a highly common attempt to draw a foul though, not at all an intent to injure. That’s a horrible call. Melo was in the air trying to score, its a basketball play. At most, you call it an offensive foul and move on

Re: Carmelo ejected for flagrant 2
« Reply #13 on: November 06, 2017, 07:35:32 AM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 58684
  • Tommy Points: -25629
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
I don't know if it's a flagrant 2 but it's probably, at least, a flagrant 1. Especially if you watch it from the overheard angle, you can see really clearly that Melo is not jumping toward the basket at all, he's jumping into Nurkic on purpose. That's not uncommon (IT and Harden and many others have made a career of it) but rather than turn his body away from Nurkic, toward the rim (as one would do when one is trying to score) he actually turns his body away from the basket.

To the ref's point, it does look pretty unnatural to me.

He’s trying to finish through contact. It’s hard to say he’s not trying to score when, in fact, he scored. The initial contact was by the defender, which is why Carmelo was given an And-1.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Re: Carmelo ejected for flagrant 2
« Reply #14 on: November 06, 2017, 07:49:34 AM »

Offline Big333223

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7500
  • Tommy Points: 742
I don't know if it's a flagrant 2 but it's probably, at least, a flagrant 1. Especially if you watch it from the overheard angle, you can see really clearly that Melo is not jumping toward the basket at all, he's jumping into Nurkic on purpose. That's not uncommon (IT and Harden and many others have made a career of it) but rather than turn his body away from Nurkic, toward the rim (as one would do when one is trying to score) he actually turns his body away from the basket.

To the ref's point, it does look pretty unnatural to me.

That’s a highly common attempt to draw a foul though, not at all an intent to injure. That’s a horrible call. Melo was in the air trying to score, its a basketball play. At most, you call it an offensive foul and move on
He’s trying to finish through contact. It’s hard to say he’s not trying to score when, in fact, he scored. The initial contact was by the defender, which is why Carmelo was given an And-1.
I don't know what to tell you other than to look at the video. He doesn't jump toward the basket, he jumps at Nurkic and he turns away from the rim. It looks to me like his goal was to create contact first and shoot second. Which is exactly what happened.

I know this is a common play, I said that it wasn't uncommon in my post. Just because refs typically give the offensive player the benefit of the doubt doesn't mean they're right to reward offensive players for trying to engineer and-1's by creating contact.
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008