... Kuzma would ... go in the top 5 in a draft redo this second
No, he wouldn’t.
No? He's the 2nd highest scorer in his draft class with a TS% of 63.8? There are 5 players you'd draft above him?
Of course there are. You draft for potential, not rookie year production.
Kuzma is only 22, it's not like he's Brogdon getting drafted at 24. By that logic, in a 2012 re-draft, Damien Lillard doesn't deserve to make it in the top 5 (he was drafted at 22 as well).
Edit: Also the rule of thumb is typically to draft the best player available. Not draft off potential.
That's a horrible interpretation of what Roy is saying. Lillard is a legitimate All Star talent. Kuzma is not. Lillard being older in his draft class is irrelevant now because of that. Kuzma being older is still very much relevant because they're rookies, and you draft for long term production (which younger guys usually have more potential for), not rookie season production
Saying Lillard wouldn't be top 5 based on Roy's logic would only make sense if Roy was saying that 22 year olds should be drafted later because they have less of a career (in terms of length) ahead of them
No I get what he's saying, I only used Lillard as an example because he was a 22 year old drafted outside the top 5. My point was, wouldn't most people agree he would've gone top 5 in a re-draft after his rookie season?
I'm not talking about anything he did past rookie season. Him turning into an All-Star afterwards has nothing to do with what I'm saying.
Edit: Just to clarify when I say "wouldn't most people agree he would've gone top 5 in a re-draft after his rookie season?" I mean that I don't believe most people would omit Lillard from the top 5 in a re-draft due to his age after his rookie season. If the kid balls, he balls.