If the whole point of this thread was to say Simmons can't shoot well yeah. Everyone knows that. He can impact the game in other ways cause there aren't many 6'10" ball handlers who can finish like him. But teams will dare him to shoot. His main problem is not that he is a poor shooter. He just can't shoot period. He is getting better as a defender. But there is no reason he shouldn't be an easy 19-7-5 guy a night even without a jumpshot and teams exploiting that.
Exactly. The whole premise of this thread is misleading, as if the OP, or anyone else, wouldn't want Simmons on the Celtics.
In just 22 MPG during the preseason, the 6'10" Simmons averaged 10.8 ppg, 5.7 rpg, 5.3 apg, and 1.7 spg, while shooting 47% from the field.
A recipe for success for the Sixers would be to run high PNR with Simmons and Embiid, while the latter is not injured, and flank them with shooters like Redick, Covington, and Bayless.
I do agree that Fultz is the one that they should be concerned about. I read a stat that he did not take a single perimeter shot over the 47 minutes he played during preseason games. Not just a 3pt attempt, no perimeter attempts period. His 24 shots taken were all on drives and he had a lot of open opportunities.
Check out the space Bayless is giving Fultz during a scrimmage. Bayless obviously is aware that Fultz can't shoot so basically gives him the Rondo free safety treatment.