Author Topic: Smart ranked #65 in the League  (Read 5024 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Smart ranked #65 in the League
« Reply #30 on: September 12, 2017, 08:37:59 PM »

Offline Wretch

  • Terry Rozier
  • Posts: 60
  • Tommy Points: 10

Re: Smart ranked #65 in the League
« Reply #31 on: September 12, 2017, 09:02:52 PM »

Offline eja117

  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17756
  • Tommy Points: 1131
Did they completely change the way they do the rankings?

Re: Smart ranked #65 in the League
« Reply #32 on: September 12, 2017, 09:04:53 PM »

Offline Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33048
  • Tommy Points: -27977
  • 33,333 posts and counting . . .
This would place Marcus as an elite third man on a roster, if teams were distributed evenly. It seems quite high to me.

What's particularly weird to me is, if we assume that the rankings take an average of various panelists, that means that some probably ranked Marcus significantly higher than 65th. I'd love to hear how people came to that conclusion.


Once a CrotoNat, always a CrotoNat.  CelticsBlog Draft Champions, 2009 & 2012;
DKC Draft 2015 Champions and beyond...

Re: Smart ranked #65 in the League
« Reply #33 on: September 12, 2017, 09:59:51 PM »

Offline D Dub

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3063
  • Tommy Points: 241
This would place Marcus as an elite third man on a roster, if teams were distributed evenly. It seems quite high to me.

What's particularly weird to me is, if we assume that the rankings take an average of various panelists, that means that some probably ranked Marcus significantly higher than 65th. I'd love to hear how people came to that conclusion.

Does seem high, but if you made a list of best defenders, he's top 5-10 right?

Re: Smart ranked #65 in the League
« Reply #34 on: September 12, 2017, 10:08:05 PM »

Online nickagneta

  • Global Moderator
  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30845
  • Tommy Points: 5153
This would place Marcus as an elite third man on a roster, if teams were distributed evenly. It seems quite high to me.

What's particularly weird to me is, if we assume that the rankings take an average of various panelists, that means that some probably ranked Marcus significantly higher than 65th. I'd love to hear how people came to that conclusion.
I was thinking the same thing. Like was there two moronic outliers that had Marcus in their top ten and everyone else had him down at around 120. If so, please send whatever those guys are smoking to my house. I need a smoke before rewatching Harold and Kumar go to White Castle.

Re: Smart ranked #65 in the League
« Reply #35 on: September 12, 2017, 10:12:51 PM »

Offline JBcat

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2497
  • Tommy Points: 443
This would place Marcus as an elite third man on a roster, if teams were distributed evenly. It seems quite high to me.

What's particularly weird to me is, if we assume that the rankings take an average of various panelists, that means that some probably ranked Marcus significantly higher than 65th. I'd love to hear how people came to that conclusion.

There are enough teams where he would be the 3rd guy, and some even maybe 2 on the really bad teams like the Nets, Kings etc. 

These rankings do seem a little wacky though. 

Re: Smart ranked #65 in the League
« Reply #36 on: September 12, 2017, 10:17:02 PM »

Offline eja117

  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17756
  • Tommy Points: 1131
See stuff like this is why I don't really believe in elite abilities in the same way any more. Do you think you could do a better job as an NBA GM? Uh....I think a drunk elephant suffering from seizures could do better than Isaiah Thomas, so yeah.  Do you think a guy off a fan board could do a better job of covering the NBA?  Uh....well.....assuming ESPN doesn't fire Roy Hobbes here for not being a flaming liberal his first 15 minutes on the job....yeah I definitely definitely think he could do better without any doubt whatsoever. None.

It's just the way it is now.

Re: Smart ranked #65 in the League
« Reply #37 on: September 12, 2017, 10:18:59 PM »

Offline eja117

  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17756
  • Tommy Points: 1131
This would place Marcus as an elite third man on a roster, if teams were distributed evenly. It seems quite high to me.

What's particularly weird to me is, if we assume that the rankings take an average of various panelists, that means that some probably ranked Marcus significantly higher than 65th. I'd love to hear how people came to that conclusion.

There are enough teams where he would be the 3rd guy, and some even maybe 2 on the really bad teams like the Nets, Kings etc. 

These rankings do seem a little wacky though.
I'm not sure he's even #3 on the Kings

DeArron Fox, Skal Labisierre, Willy Cauley Stein, Buddy Hield

If Smart was traded for any of them straight up I don't think I'd be too worried or nervous, money issues aside.

Re: Smart ranked #65 in the League
« Reply #38 on: September 12, 2017, 10:22:27 PM »

Online nickagneta

  • Global Moderator
  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30845
  • Tommy Points: 5153
See stuff like this is why I don't really believe in elite abilities in the same way any more. Do you think you could do a better job as an NBA GM? Uh....I think a drunk elephant suffering from seizures could do better than Isaiah Thomas, so yeah.  Do you think a guy off a fan board could do a better job of covering the NBA?  Uh....well.....assuming ESPN doesn't fire Roy Hobbes here for not being a flaming liberal his first 15 minutes on the job....yeah I definitely definitely think he could do better without any doubt whatsoever. None.

It's just the way it is now.
Ha...Roy a liberal...hehehe. Thats funny.

Re: Smart ranked #65 in the League
« Reply #39 on: September 12, 2017, 10:26:42 PM »

Offline Endless Paradise

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2829
  • Tommy Points: 177
Melo been in the league a long time and has had plenty of chance to get somewhere.  He made it to the WCF once.... then demaded a trade.

Melos game is not good for a winning team.  He is an isolation mid range player. It's antiquated and ineffective.

Way to tapdance around your assertion that Melo's been a negative player his whole career was awful, as well as ignoring the very valid Paul Pierce reference.

Re: Smart ranked #65 in the League
« Reply #40 on: September 12, 2017, 10:37:14 PM »

Offline Bucketgetter

  • Kyrie Irving
  • Posts: 887
  • Tommy Points: 160
This would place Marcus as an elite third man on a roster, if teams were distributed evenly. It seems quite high to me.

What's particularly weird to me is, if we assume that the rankings take an average of various panelists, that means that some probably ranked Marcus significantly higher than 65th. I'd love to hear how people came to that conclusion.

There are enough teams where he would be the 3rd guy, and some even maybe 2 on the really bad teams like the Nets, Kings etc. 

These rankings do seem a little wacky though.
I'm not sure he's even #3 on the Kings

DeArron Fox, Skal Labisierre, Willy Cauley Stein, Buddy Hield

If Smart was traded for any of them straight up I don't think I'd be too worried or nervous, money issues aside.
The list is based off how good these guys are right now though, not in the future. If the league ended after this year and we traded Smart for any of them, Id be pretty p---ed.
CB Draft
Sacramento Kings
Coach: Dave Joerger
Roster: Kawhi Leonard, Damian Lillard, Marvin Williams, Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, John Henson, Boban Marjanovic, Rodney Stuckey, Wade Baldwin IV, Taurean Prince, Andrew Nicholson, D.J. Augustin, Jeff Withey, James Jones, Charlie Villanueva, Jordan Adams

Re: Smart ranked #65 in the League
« Reply #41 on: September 12, 2017, 10:56:22 PM »

Offline action781

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4182
  • Tommy Points: 320
Lots of insanity.  Malcolm Brogdon at #56?  Ahead of all those players mentioned and also Teague, Wiggins, Devin Booker, and Harrison Barnes.
.................to the
Assistant ^ General Manager for the Pawnee Pacers

Tony Parker, Courtney Lee, Rudy Gay, Zach Randolph, Marc Gasol
Jeff Teague, Paul George, Trevor Ariza, Chuck Hayes, Channing Frye
Kemba Walker, Andres Nocioni, Jason Collins

Re: Smart ranked #65 in the League
« Reply #42 on: September 12, 2017, 11:07:53 PM »

Offline rocknrollforyoursoul

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5116
  • Tommy Points: 880
If only Smart could, you know, score the ball.
"There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those to whom God says, 'All right, then, have it your way.'"

"You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body."

C.S. Lewis


Re: Smart ranked #65 in the League
« Reply #43 on: September 12, 2017, 11:17:56 PM »

Offline Phantom255x

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6214
  • Tommy Points: 468
  • On To Banner 18!
I think Melo is overrated, but despite that and regardless how you feel about him, the fact that he's #64 and one spot before Lonzo Freakin' Ball is an absolute joke.

ESPN is becoming garbage lately. Some of the reporters are alright but the rest are just trash. These rankings are a joke too. It's too bad they scooped up Woj too because I loved him before, but now it seems obvious he's stirring up drama whenever he can to generate clicks. The ESPN way  ::)


Re: Smart ranked #65 in the League
« Reply #44 on: September 12, 2017, 11:19:00 PM »

Offline smokeablount

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1207
  • Tommy Points: 66
This would place Marcus as an elite third man on a roster, if teams were distributed evenly. It seems quite high to me.

What's particularly weird to me is, if we assume that the rankings take an average of various panelists, that means that some probably ranked Marcus significantly higher than 65th. I'd love to hear how people came to that conclusion.

There are enough teams where he would be the 3rd guy, and some even maybe 2 on the really bad teams like the Nets, Kings etc. 

These rankings do seem a little wacky though.
I'm not sure he's even #3 on the Kings

DeArron Fox, Skal Labisierre, Willy Cauley Stein, Buddy Hield

If Smart was traded for any of them straight up I don't think I'd be too worried or nervous, money issues aside.
The list is based off how good these guys are right now though, not in the future. If the league ended after this year and we traded Smart for any of them, Id be pretty p---ed.

You'd be p---ed if we traded Marcus Smart for De'Aaron Fox?
Give us this pick, Almighty Red
And forgive us our tanking
As we forgive those who tanked against us
And lead us not into the lottery
But deliver us from losing

-Sexyscottish