I think Cleveland aren't done trading, after the Irving trade I wouldn't put them closer to GS than before, but they do have some added versatility. I don't think they are minded to trade the Brooklyn pick unless they are presented with a no brainer. However there are still players out there that they have been linked to who make sense.
Cle in: Melo, O'Quinn, lotto protected 1st
Cle out: Love, Shump
NYK in: Shump, Monroe, Parker
NYK out: Melo, O'Quinn, lotto protected 1st
Mil in: Love
Mil out: Monroe, Parker
Why for Cleveland? Love is a very good player but he doesn't provide what is needed to beat GS, he isn't quick enough on defence and he can't move into the C role. If James leaves in the summer he also doesn't fit with their longer rebuilding timeline. I query here if they get anywhere near the value they should get for him but they do dump Shump and gain Melo who is a much better fit in the PF role in Cleveland. His bully ball style would be far more effective against the GS players, particularly Durant. A lotto protected pick should even the value.
Why for New York? They gain Parker for Melo at the price of Shumps contract. Parker is a high risk player at this point but should he work out then he's a great front court partner for KP. They give up a future 1st but they would be trending up and that shouldn't hurt too much. Monroe is an interesting piece here, should he fit well he may find a future there.
Why for Milwaukee? They get Love to partner with GA in their growing core. They would have Thon developing at C and can play Henson there as well. Love adds spacing that they desperately need alongside GA. They give up Monroe, who is leaving anyway, and Parker, who is oft injured.
Thoughts welcome