Author Topic: Salary cap situation and FAQs  (Read 12944 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Salary cap situation and FAQs
« on: August 18, 2007, 11:08:31 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6425
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
User "Icky" suggested that the site institute a salary cap page, where users could go as a sort of one stop shop for all questions and information related to the salary cap.  This thread is the beginning of that.  As more players are signed, more information is disclosed, or more questions present themselves, this will be updated.  (And yes, this duplicates the front page post, but this should hopefully be kept up on a more permanent basis.)

Salaries:
====================================================================
Player2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-2012
Kevin Garnett$23,750,000$24,750,000$16,400,000$18,800,000$21,200,000
Paul Pierce$16,360,095$18,077,903$19,795,712$21,515,521n/a
Ray Allen$16,000,000$17,388,430$18,776,860n/an/a
Kendrick Perkins$4,480,912$4,078,880$4,250,000$4,390,208n/a
James Posey$3,206,000$3,462,000n/an/an/a
Brian Scalabrine$3,000,000$3,206,897$3,413,793n/an/a
Tony Allen$1,888,141$2,744,299n/an/an/a
Eddie House$1,500,000n/an/an/an/a
Rajon Rondo$1,372,320$1,646,784$2,623,326$3,780,214n/a
Scot Pollard*$770,610*n/an/an/an/a
Dahntay Jones*$770,610*n/an/an/an/a
Esteban Batista**$770,610**n/an/an/an/a
Leon Powe$687,456$797,581n/an/an/a
Gabe Pruitt$650,000$711,517$729,005n/an/a
Glen Davis$427,163$711,517n/an/an/a
Brandon Wallace$427,163**$711,517n/an/an/a
Jackie Manuel$427,163**?n/an/an/a
Wally Szczerbiak$775,000$775,000n/an/an/a
Totals:$74,867,697$78,350,808$65,988,696$48,483,943$21,200,000
====================================================================
Team options are in red and qualifying offers are in green.  Salaries shown in orange represent non-guaranteed / partially guaranteed deals, while trade kickers and other owed salary obligations are in purple. Player options are listed in blue. Total salary assumes all options and qualifying offers are picked up, but does not count the non-guaranteed deals of Brandon Wallace, Jackie Manuel, Esteban Batista, or Dahntay Jones.

* Scot Pollard's 2007-08 salary is $1,219,590.  If Dahntay Jones makes the team, his salary is $826,046.  The Celtics are responsible only for the first $770,610 of these salaries, as explained below.

** The contracts of Brandon Wallace / Jackie Manuel are only partially guaranteed.  The contracts of Dahntay Jones and Esteban Batista are non-guaranteed.


Frequently asked questions:

1) How much is the salary cap for the 2007-2008 season?  How much is the luxury tax?  What is the difference between these two numbers?

The salary cap for this season is $55.63 million.  The luxury tax is $67.865 million.  A lot of people get these two numbers confused, so I'll do my best to explain.  However, the absolute best place to have these questions explained in detail in on Larry Coon's NBA Salary Cap FAQ page.

Essentially, the salary cap is a "soft" number which serves the purposes of limiting a team's ability to offer free agents from other teams contracts.  A team can offer a free agent a starting salary below or equivalent to its amount of remaining cap room.  For instance, if a team is $7 million below the salary cap, it can offer a free agent from another team a deal starting at $7 million per season.  If a team is over the cap, the most it can offer is the mid-level exception (the "MLE"), explained in greater detail below.  Obviously, we are far above the salary cap, and as such, for purposes of the Celtics discussion of the salary cap is purely academic.

More relevant is the luxury tax.  Basically, for teams that exceed the luxury tax, they pay a dollar for dollar penalty on amounts above the tax.  This money goes to the league, where it is divied up between the teams that stayed below the tax (again, this is overly simplistic, but you get the idea.)  Right now, we're going to be roughly $4 million over the luxury tax, which means that Wyc and Company will be writing a check in that amount to the league at the end of the season.  They also won't have the benefit of a rebate from the paying teams; last year, that rebate check was approximately $1.9 million per non-paying team.

2) What is an "exception"?

An exception is just that:  an "exception" to the salary cap that allows a team to go over the salary cap to sign, or in some cases trade for, a free agent.  For the Celtics, there are four relevant exceptions: the mid-level exception ("MLE"), the Bi-annual exception (also called the "LLE" or the "million dollar exception"), the minimum salary exception (also sometimes called the "veteran's minimum"), and the traded player exception.

The MLE: The MLE can be used to sign players to contracts for a maximum of five years, with 8% annual raises each year.  This exception is available to teams above the salary cap, and can be used annually.  For the 2007-08 season, the MLE can be used to give free agents contracts starting at $5.356 million.  The MLE can be used in its entirety on one player, or can be split amongst several players. 

The LLE: The LLE can be used to sign players to contracts for a maximum of two year, with up to an 8% annual raise in the second year.  This exception is available to teams above the salary cap, but can only be used every other year.  For the 2007-08 season, the LLE is set at $1.83 million; in 2008-09, the LLE will be $1.91 million.  The LLE can be used in its entirety on one player, or can be split amongst multiple players.

The Minimum Salary Exception:  This is an important one for the Celtics, for reasons that will be explained in greater detail below.  This exception allows a team to sign a player to the allocated minimum salary, which varies subject to the signing player's service time.  Contracts signed with the minimum can be up to two years in length.

The Traded Player Exception: In trades where the incoming and outgoing salary are not identical, a "trade exception" is created.  The team sending out more salary in a trade gets the benefit of a "trade exception", which is in the amount of the difference in salaries between the incoming and outgoing amounts.  In the Celtics case', they acquired a $1,080,480 exception in the Ray Allen deal.  This exception has to be used within one year of the trade date.  It can be used to take back a player making up to $100,000 more than the trade exception, meaning we can use the exception to trade for a maximum salary of $1,180,480.  The trade exception can't be combined with players or other exceptions; I'm unclear if draft picks can be traded in conjunction with a player for a trade exception, although I believe they can.

3) What have we spent?  How much do we have left?

So far, we have used only a portion of one of our exceptions.  We used $1.5 million of the MLE to sign Eddie House.  That means we have the following amounts left:

MLE: $3.856 million ($5.356 million - $1.5 million = $3.856 million)

LLE: $1.83 million

Minimum: This varies based upon a player's service time.  For a rookie, the minimum salary for 2007-08 is $427,163.  For a player with ten or more years worth of service time, the minimum is $1,219,590.  The team can sign as many players as it wants to the minimum; such contracts can be guaranteed or non-guaranteed. Scot Pollard, Jackie Manuel, and Brandon Wallace were signed using this exception. 

Trade exception: $1,180,480 can be acquired in trade, subject to the conditions above (ie, can't be combined with other players or exceptions.)

4) How many players do we have under contract?  What is the maximum number of players we can have on our roster?  Is there a minimum to the players we can have under contract?

Currently, we have 12 players under contract.  We also have the draft rights to Gabe Pruitt and Glen Davis, who are expected to sign contracts.

Once the season starts, a team can have a maximum of 15 players under contract, and a minimum of 13 players.  Rosters must be finalized on or before October 31, 2007. 

5) What are non-guaranteed contracts?  How do these effect the Celtics?

Most contracts in the NBA are fully guaranteed, meaning that regardless of whether a player is waived or is otherwise unable to perform, the team is on the hook for his entire contract (subject to some limitations).  Some players have non-guaranteed or partially-guaranteed contracts, meaning that is a team cuts ties with a player before a certain specified date, they are only responsible for paying part of that player's contract.

Brandon Wallace and Jackie Manuel were both signed to non-guaranteed contracts.  Wallace's calls for him to receive $100,000 guaranteed, and if he is still on the roster as of December 20, 2007, the remainder of his rookie minimum deal becomes guaranteed.  Financial terms of Manuel's guarantee have not been disclosed.

The non-guaranteed aspect of these deals is important because if the team finds itself wanting to add a free agent that would bring the team above the 15-player maximum roster, they can cut one of these two with a fairly minor financial penalty.

6) What are the benefits to signing a player to a minimum deal?

There are several advantages to signing a player to a minimum deal.  First, there is no limit to the number of players a sign can sign to the minimum.  Second, any player signed to the minimum doesn't count against the MLE, meaning the MLE can be allocated towards other players.  Most importantly, though, the NBA actually subsidizes teams that sign players to the minimum.  The team is only responsible for the first $770,610 of player salary; the league pays any amount over this threshold.  Additionally, only $770,610 counts towards the luxury tax.

7)  Why did we sign Eddie House with a portion of the MLE, rather than with the LLE?

The answer to this question isn't clear.  I would speculate that the team had no intention of allocating the full MLE to a player this off-season, and thus didn't see it as a major detriment to use a portion of the MLE on House.  By not using the LLE this season, they will have it available next year, when the free agent crop will be better.  It could very well be that Danny is already targeting next year's free agent class, and wants to have as much money available as possible.

8) If Reggie Miller signs here, how much is he likely to sign for?

Reggie has said that if he comes back, his sole interest will be in winning a championship.  Thus, it is likely that he would agree to a deal for the minimum salary.

9) Why haven't Glen Davis and Gabe Pruitt signed their rookie deals yet? Is this unusual?  What's taking so long?

Here are the approximate dates on which Danny's previous second-rounders signed their rookie contracts:

July 18: Leon Powe
July 26: Orien Greene
July 28: Brandon Hunter
August 18: Ryan Gomes
August 27: Justin Reed

Thus, it's not all that unusual that Pruitt and Davis haven't signed yet.  This has been a spectacularly busy off-season for the front office, between the Allen and KG trades and the free agent signings of House and Pollard (and the free agent pursuits of others.)  There's no reason to expect that the rookies won't get signed; the team didn't sign Justin Reed -- in a less busy off-season -- until August 27.  From all indications, Big Baby is participating in team activities.  I haven't heard anything concerning Pruitt since summer league, but I have no reason to think he won't be with the team.  Remember, this kid was drafted with the second pick in the second round.  He's not going anywhere.

10) What if Big Baby or Pruitt don't sign?

So long as the team extends the player a qualifying tender -- which is essentially a one-year contract offer for the rookie minimum -- we will retain his rights.  If the player signs a contract with a non-NBA team, we own his rights until one year after that contractual obligation ends.  If the player doesn't sign a contract with another team, we retain his rights until the day of next year's draft, when the player can be drafted again by any team. 

11) What's this I hear about the Celtics signing their second-rounders with the MLE?

Another potential holdup with the signing of Pruitt and Davis is that the team is determining how much of the MLE it will have left to sign them with.  Danny Ainge has made a practice of signing second-rounders with a portion of the MLE.  Why? Because the team wants to sign its rookies to three year contracts, and teams can not offer three year deals with either the LLE or the minimum salary exception.

Signing a player to a three year deal (usually one year guaranteed with two options) is important for two reasons. First, because it keeps the player on a rookie pay scale for three years, instead of the typical two.  Right now, this team needs cheap young talent, as it has three well-paid superstars on the roster.  Secondly, signing players to a three year deal means that the team acquires "Bird rights" in that player, meaning that the team can exceed the salary cap to sign that player without having to use the MLE or another exception.  This is helpful in holding on to our free agents, in case Danny hits it big on one of his draft picks.

12) Assuming we sign Pruitt and Davis with the MLE, how much will we have left to spend?

Based upon contracts of former players drafted high in the second round, it is likely that Pruitt and Davis will each sign for deals somewhere around $650,000 - $700,000.  Assuming they each sign for $700,000, that would leave us with $2.456 million to allocate towards additional free agents with the MLE.

13) Why is Wally Szczerbiak included in the above chart?  Didn't we trade him to Seattle?

Wally's contract that is the gift that keeps on giving.  At the time we traded for Wally Szczerbiak, his contract contained a trade kicker, which is essentially a one-time bonus paid to a player by a team acquiring him in a trade.  While the team already paid this bonus in full, for cap purposes the trade kicker was divided up equally over the remaining years of Wally's contract.  This obligation remains with Boston -- even though Wally was traded to Seattle -- for the remainder of Wally's original Boston contract.  As such, we are carrying a hit from Wally's trade kicker for the next two seasons.  The most recent information I have seen on this trade kicker is $775,000 for each of the next two seasons.

14)  What is a buyout?  Why do people keep talking about them?

At any time, a team and a player can agree to a buyout of that team's remaining salary obligation to that player.  The Celtics did this with Vin Baker, and in recent years Chris Webber, Tim Thomas, Steve Francis, Derek Fisher, Troy Hudson, Adonal Foyle, and others have all agreed to buyouts.  In a buyout situation, the team pays a player a reduced amount, and allows that player to become an unrestricted free agent (after they clear waivers).  The team executing the buyout is responsible for the agreed upon sum, with the cap hit being divided out equally among the remaining years of the contract (ie, in Vin Baker's deal, he had three years on his deal, and he agreed to a $16 million buyout.  Thus, the team carried a $5.33 million cap hit on its salary cap for three years.)

There is speculation that a number of players could be bought out of their contracts this season, including Sarunas Jasikevicius and Sam Cassell.  If that happens, the players would in all likehihood become unrestricted free agents, allowing them the chance to negotiate with the Celtics.  Again, this is entirely speculation, but it's the reason you here so much chatter about potential buyout situations. 
« Last Edit: October 08, 2007, 09:22:33 PM by Roy Hobbs »

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: Salary cap situation and FAQs
« Reply #1 on: August 18, 2007, 11:16:33 PM »

Offline Brendan

  • Ray Allen
  • **
  • Posts: 2988
  • Tommy Points: 72
    • Self Assay
I find it more useful to slot in draft picks that we own the rights to going forward, since like players, unless traded they will almost certainly result in cap hits.

Re: Salary cap situation and FAQs
« Reply #2 on: August 18, 2007, 11:22:24 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6425
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
I find it more useful to slot in draft picks that we own the rights to going forward, since like players, unless traded they will almost certainly result in cap hits.


I wanted to try to keep speculation to a minimum.  While I estimated salaries for Manuel (although his will be accurate), Pruitt, and Davis, I didn't want to get into vague estimates of draft pick salaries yet.  We have little idea where we'll be picking in '08 or '10, and I don't want people to rely too much on something that isn't accurate.  While estimating draft picks is definitely a useful tool in speculating concerning future salary obligations, I posted this primarily for information purposes, and I want to keep confusion to a minimum.

For anybody who wants to know potential future salaries being added to the team, though, right now we have:

2008: Boston #1, Boston #2 or Portland #2 (owed to Seattle; whichever is lesser?)
2009: Boston #2
2010: Boston #1, Boston #2
2011: Boston #1, Boston #2

The same reason (speculation) is why I didn't estimate the increase in the luxury tax over the coming seasons.  Between '05 and '06, the salary cap increased by 7.34% and the luxury tax increased by 6.03%.  Between '06 and '07, the salary cap increased by 4.7% and the luxury tax increased by 3.74%.  Going forward, I would estimate increases of approximately 5% and 3.5%, but that's speculation on my part.
« Last Edit: August 18, 2007, 11:38:49 PM by Roy Hobbs »

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: Salary cap situation and FAQs
« Reply #3 on: August 19, 2007, 10:42:37 AM »

Offline davemonsterband

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1126
  • Tommy Points: 159
Thanks for all the work Mr Hobbs.  I'd also like to suggest the idea of a daily tidbit to do with the cap/contracts so we can learn something new every day and maybe discuss examples and scenarios when things are going slow.  It seems to me that this stuff is getting harder to keep track of every day.
« Last Edit: August 19, 2007, 10:47:57 AM by davemonsterband »
"The Best Revenge Is Massive Success"
~Ole Blue Eyes~

Re: Salary cap situation and FAQs
« Reply #4 on: August 19, 2007, 11:06:10 PM »

Offline Brendan

  • Ray Allen
  • **
  • Posts: 2988
  • Tommy Points: 72
    • Self Assay
Hobbs,

Do you have a link for the Wally thing? Wouldn't his trade kicker have been exercised when he was traded from Minny to Boston? Just this is the first I have heard of that provision.

-B


Re: Salary cap situation and FAQs
« Reply #5 on: August 19, 2007, 11:15:33 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6425
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
Hobbs,

Do you have a link for the Wally thing? Wouldn't his trade kicker have been exercised when he was traded from Minny to Boston? Just this is the first I have heard of that provision.

-B



It was exercised / paid at the time.  However, the cap hit is spread equally over the remaining years of the contract.  That's the same thing that happened with KG, and is indeed one of the reasons why a contract extension was so important:  to allow his trade kicker to be spread out, and keep our luxury tax down.

I've seen the Wally thing mentioned a few times.  One place it's mentioned is here; although this site hasn't been updated since the KG trade, it's info for Wally seems accurate.  See also questions #83 and #84 in Larry Coon's writeup.
« Last Edit: August 19, 2007, 11:18:36 PM by Roy Hobbs »

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: Salary cap situation and FAQs
« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2007, 08:09:26 PM »

Offline paintitgreen

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1103
  • Tommy Points: 154
Unreal, Roy, and anybody else who helped with that. Thanks for all the work.
Go Celtics.

Re: Salary cap situation and FAQs
« Reply #7 on: August 25, 2007, 03:34:45 PM »

Offline FrieCod

  • Brandon Bass
  • Posts: 491
  • Tommy Points: 18
Posey is set to make 3 million a year in a multiyear deal, and we still need a pg.  Our funds seem to be getting a little bit tight.

Questions about some of our contracts
« Reply #8 on: August 26, 2007, 01:35:40 PM »

Offline P2

  • Ray Allen
  • **
  • Posts: 2048
  • Tommy Points: 162
  • Green 18!
http://www.hoopshype.com/salaries/boston.htm

Tony Allen:
We can give him a qualifying offer next season. But if we don't extend him this season, does that mean he is a restricted free agent after this season? Would he be in the same situation as Mickael Pietrus this year?

Rajon Rondo:
There is a team option for the next two years. Does that mean that if we decide we want to keep him but he doesn't agree, he will stay anyway? Must the desire of re-signing be mutual?

Brandon Wallace/Jackie Manuel:
I assume if we keep Manuel, he will have the next year as a team option just like Wallace. Again, must both players agree to stay next season in order to use this option? And does Manuel even have a second-year option?

James Posey:
The second year is the player's option.
(1) Does that mean that he will be a free agent after this season? And if yes, is he restricted or not? We wouldn't benefit in that case, because it's like signing him to a one year contract, and asking him next year if he wants to sign again.
(2) Or is it a two year contract in which he can opt out after this season? That would mean that if he stays, we would have the full MLE again next season, the contrary to (1).

Re: Questions about some of our contracts
« Reply #9 on: August 26, 2007, 01:41:25 PM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Ray Allen
  • **
  • Posts: 2930
  • Tommy Points: 146
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
Tony - I think he will be a RFA.

Rondo -  I think the team option would be an offer.  Rajon doesn't have to take it if he thinks he can make more money on the open market (or if he doesn't like it here, he, he).

Manuel - He's not even guaranteed for this season, never mind next year.  He could be cut after training camp (or sooner if there's another FA signing or a trade)

Not sure about Posey yet.
« Last Edit: August 26, 2007, 01:45:14 PM by Surferdad »

Re: Questions about some of our contracts
« Reply #10 on: August 26, 2007, 01:46:57 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6425
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
A good place to start is here.

The current CBA treats restricted free agency as follows:

Quote
here are two types of free agency: restricted and unrestricted. An unrestricted free agent is free to sign with any other team, and there's nothing the player's original team can do to prevent it.  Restricted free agency gives the player's original team the right to keep the player by matching an offer sheet the player signs with another team. One example is from August 2002, when Minnesota signed Ricky Davis to an offer sheet, but Cleveland matched the offer and retained him.

Restricted free agency exists only on a limited basis.  It is allowed following the fourth year of rookie "scale" contracts for first-round draft picks (see question number 41).  It is also allowed for all veteran free agents who have been in the league three or fewer seasons.  However, a first round draft pick becomes an unrestricted free agent following his second or third season if his team does not exercise its option to extend the player's rookie scale contract for the next season.  All other free agency is limited to unrestricted free agency.

To answer your questions:

1) If we don't extend Tony Allen, he is a restricted free agent this summer.  He then has three options:  he can resign with us, he can take our qualifying offer and enter unrestricted free agency the next summer, or he can sign an offer sheet with another team, which we have the option of matching.

2) As with all team options, if we exercise the option, the player has to play for us or nobody.

3) There has been no reports of Manuel's deal including an option.  Wallace's deal is a team option, meaning whether he comes back next season is up to the Celtics.

4) Posey has two options next season:  he can either enter unrestricted free agency, or he can come back and play for us at an agreed upon price for a second season.  If he declines his player option, we can resign him, although we don't have his Bird rights.

There's a contracts FAQ at the top of the Celtics Talk forum; I'll incorporate some of these type of questions to it eventually.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: Questions about some of our contracts
« Reply #11 on: August 26, 2007, 01:49:15 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6425
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
Rondo -  I think the team option would be an offer.  Rajon doesn't have to take it if he thinks he can make more money on the open market (or if he doesn't like it here, he, he).

That is incorrect.  Players have no say in team options, just as teams have no say in player options.  There is such a thing as a mutual option, where either team can decline.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: Questions about some of our contracts
« Reply #12 on: August 26, 2007, 01:51:20 PM »

Offline P2

  • Ray Allen
  • **
  • Posts: 2048
  • Tommy Points: 162
  • Green 18!
But Roy, if Posey chooses the player's option, does that mean it will become a two year contract and it's still the MLE from last year? Or will we have to use next year's MLE on him and Tony Allen (if he declines the qualifying offer)?

Re: Questions about some of our contracts
« Reply #13 on: August 26, 2007, 01:52:44 PM »

Offline P2

  • Ray Allen
  • **
  • Posts: 2048
  • Tommy Points: 162
  • Green 18!
Rondo -  I think the team option would be an offer.  Rajon doesn't have to take it if he thinks he can make more money on the open market (or if he doesn't like it here, he, he).

That is incorrect.  Players have no say in team options, just as teams have no say in player options.  There is such a thing as a mutual option, where either team can decline.

So that means we will use the team option for the next two years on Rondo in order to let him play for cheap, and he will have no say?

Re: Questions about some of our contracts
« Reply #14 on: August 26, 2007, 02:01:06 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6425
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
But Roy, if Posey chooses the player's option, does that mean it will become a two year contract and it's still the MLE from last year? Or will we have to use next year's MLE on him and Tony Allen (if he declines the qualifying offer)?

If Posey picks up his option, it doesn't count against next season's MLE or any other exception; it's a valid contract signed under this year's MLE.  As for Tony Allen, we wouldn't have to use the MLE on him.  If we sign him to an extension, the extension would be using his Bird rights.  If he signs his qualifying offer, that doesn't count against the MLE, either.  If we match another teams offer sheet, that once again doesn't count against our MLE.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

 

Hello! Guest

Welcome to the CelticsBlog Forums.

Welcome to CelticsBlog