We didn't lose them for nothing. We upgraded them, first with Horford, now with Hayward.
Because we signed better players in free agency we didn't lose them for nothing? I see cap space as incredibly valuable, but you can't say that you get an asset back in terms of salary if you release a player. That's nonsense.
And my goodness, in what world do we lose Jae, AB and Smart for nothing?
I hope not this world. It's a worst case scenario, but management will have tough decisions to make for who they pay next year, which they already should be planning i.m.o.
And I've been reading posts where people seem fine with letting Crowder go to Utah with nothing in return, because we don't need him anymore anyway. An argument I object strongly. It's what he's worth on the market which counts.
Lastly, Sully played as effectively as a bloated whale carcass.
Still he showed promise and in the early months of the 2015/2016 season lots of people would've liked Sullinger to come back for a reasonable contract. He was a good rebounding starting center on a play off team. He could've fetched something.
It just bothers me that we don't make trades that help us forward, but just let al these players go like they are worthless pieces. We seem to be moving behind the times. Like every time an important decision comes up, we are not prepared and have to improvise at that moment.
@ BudweiserCeltic: TP, that's exactly how I meant it.
@ everybody: I am a complainer, but I don't want to bring a negative vibe to this community. So I might slow it down a little bit. But I'm worried about the direction the team is taking and what the costs are.