Author Topic: Khris Middleton idea  (Read 2162 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Khris Middleton idea
« on: June 23, 2017, 10:25:35 PM »

Offline jay

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1346
  • Tommy Points: 50
If George costs too much, what about Middleton?

He is 6-8, shoots 40% from deep, is under contract for 3 more years, and hasn't turned 26 yet.

Might could get him for Bradley and Crowder, salaries match pretty close. I know he isn't as good as George but he is pretty dang good. And he only costs $15 mil a year. George is going to command over 30 mil a year.

This trade would help us stay under the luxury tax a litte easier if we sign Hayward.

Maybe the Bucks don't want to do it. They have a decision to make on Tony Snell, a restricted free agent. This might help them money wise by getting Bradley and letting Snell walk. It helps them get some playoff experience.

For Boston, a 40% shooter from 3 that can play 2, ,3, 4 is really what we need. Might allow us to hold on to Rozier and Smart as well. Also allows us to not have to give up any draft picks. If they do want one because Bradley will be a free agent next year, give the our own 2018 pick.

Re: Khris Middleton idea
« Reply #1 on: June 23, 2017, 10:42:00 PM »

Offline Celts Fan 508

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1159
  • Tommy Points: 54
Milwaukee won't trade him.
2019 historical draft.  Pick 12

Tim Duncan, Oscar Robertson, Elgin Baylor, Scottie Pippen, Willis Reed, Mitch Richmond, Sam Jones, Dan Majerle, Bob Cousy, Rasheed Wallace, Shawn Kemp, Marcus Camby

Re: Khris Middleton idea
« Reply #2 on: June 24, 2017, 02:34:14 PM »

Offline straightouttabahstun

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 504
  • Tommy Points: 39
  • That's turrible
I could see them taking Bradley. He'd fit in well with that core.

Re: Khris Middleton idea
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2017, 02:40:22 PM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8595
  • Tommy Points: 842
If George costs too much, what about Middleton?

He is 6-8, shoots 40% from deep, is under contract for 3 more years, and hasn't turned 26 yet.

Might could get him for Bradley and Crowder, salaries match pretty close. I know he isn't as good as George but he is pretty dang good. And he only costs $15 mil a year. George is going to command over 30 mil a year.

This trade would help us stay under the luxury tax a litte easier if we sign Hayward.

Maybe the Bucks don't want to do it. They have a decision to make on Tony Snell, a restricted free agent. This might help them money wise by getting Bradley and letting Snell walk. It helps them get some playoff experience.

For Boston, a 40% shooter from 3 that can play 2, ,3, 4 is really what we need. Might allow us to hold on to Rozier and Smart as well. Also allows us to not have to give up any draft picks. If they do want one because Bradley will be a free agent next year, give the our own 2018 pick.
Milwaukees core is him and Giannis and I think Giannis gets too much credit. Middleton is a stud. No way they move him.
Quote from: George W. Bush
Too often, we judge other groups by their worst examples while judging ourselves by our best intentions.

Re: Khris Middleton idea
« Reply #4 on: June 24, 2017, 02:55:44 PM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3141
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
If George costs too much, what about Middleton?

He is 6-8, shoots 40% from deep, is under contract for 3 more years, and hasn't turned 26 yet.

Might could get him for Bradley and Crowder, salaries match pretty close. I know he isn't as good as George but he is pretty dang good. And he only costs $15 mil a year. George is going to command over 30 mil a year.

This trade would help us stay under the luxury tax a litte easier if we sign Hayward.

Maybe the Bucks don't want to do it. They have a decision to make on Tony Snell, a restricted free agent. This might help them money wise by getting Bradley and letting Snell walk. It helps them get some playoff experience.

For Boston, a 40% shooter from 3 that can play 2, ,3, 4 is really what we need. Might allow us to hold on to Rozier and Smart as well. Also allows us to not have to give up any draft picks. If they do want one because Bradley will be a free agent next year, give the our own 2018 pick.
Milwaukees core is him and Giannis and I think Giannis gets too much credit. Middleton is a stud. No way they move him.
If Jabari was healthy I feel as though they could be swayed, but without Jabari it puts a strain on Giannis to provide lots of offence.

However, Bradley isn't a big step down from Middleton, and Crowder would help them out similarly to how he has helped us.
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Khris Middleton idea
« Reply #5 on: June 24, 2017, 03:13:49 PM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8595
  • Tommy Points: 842
If George costs too much, what about Middleton?

He is 6-8, shoots 40% from deep, is under contract for 3 more years, and hasn't turned 26 yet.

Might could get him for Bradley and Crowder, salaries match pretty close. I know he isn't as good as George but he is pretty dang good. And he only costs $15 mil a year. George is going to command over 30 mil a year.

This trade would help us stay under the luxury tax a litte easier if we sign Hayward.

Maybe the Bucks don't want to do it. They have a decision to make on Tony Snell, a restricted free agent. This might help them money wise by getting Bradley and letting Snell walk. It helps them get some playoff experience.

For Boston, a 40% shooter from 3 that can play 2, ,3, 4 is really what we need. Might allow us to hold on to Rozier and Smart as well. Also allows us to not have to give up any draft picks. If they do want one because Bradley will be a free agent next year, give the our own 2018 pick.
Milwaukees core is him and Giannis and I think Giannis gets too much credit. Middleton is a stud. No way they move him.
If Jabari was healthy I feel as though they could be swayed, but without Jabari it puts a strain on Giannis to provide lots of offence.

However, Bradley isn't a big step down from Middleton, and Crowder would help them out similarly to how he has helped us.
Obviously I've got no idea what the Milwaukee FO thinks, but for me Middleton is much more crucial to their operation than Parker. Even if Parkers healthy I can't see them moving Middleton.
Quote from: George W. Bush
Too often, we judge other groups by their worst examples while judging ourselves by our best intentions.

Re: Khris Middleton idea
« Reply #6 on: June 24, 2017, 03:54:54 PM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14446
  • Tommy Points: 972
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
No.

Re: Khris Middleton idea
« Reply #7 on: June 24, 2017, 04:25:18 PM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8825
  • Tommy Points: 289
I agree Middleton has more value than Parker. If they move a guy it would be Monroe.

They would probably do Monroe and a 1st for AB and Crowder.

Assuming they let Giannis play PG on offense they start
AB, Middelton, Giannis, Parker, Maker
Main Bench=Brogdon, Crowder, Henson.

Re: Khris Middleton idea
« Reply #8 on: June 25, 2017, 06:51:40 PM »

Offline Stig

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 442
  • Tommy Points: 26
I like Middleton but he's not that much better than Bradley. The only reason you'd swap AB with him is because AB wants a much bigger pay cheque than Middleton.

Even if we trade for him, i would not throw in Crowder, who also has a team friendly contract, I'd give them someone like Zeller plus some 2nd rounder.