Author Topic: Please indulge me. Rankings  (Read 1784 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Please indulge me. Rankings
« on: June 11, 2017, 08:35:09 PM »

Offline Greyman

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 784
  • Tommy Points: 211
Please indulge me as I believe I may have wasted a few hours on this. I took the player rankings from a Hoops Hype online article (http://hoopshype.com/2017/04/28/we-have-ranked-all-the-players-in-the-nba-this-season/) and used them to create team (squad) rankings. Simply I added up the rankings of each teams top 5 and top 10 players. So if a player ranked 15 I added 15 to that team's ranking up to the top 10 ranked players. So the lower the score the better. I used the rankings from the article if I agreed with them or not. I should also point out that better teams may have had up to 14 players ranked by the time I got to the worst teams tenth player. This blows out the scores of the worst teams but probably reflects the difference in talent. Make of it what you will.            

Team   Top 5   Top 5 rank   Top 10   Top 10 Rank
Atlanta   475             19          1580                15
Boston   240              3          1241                  8
Brooklyn   748             28          2010                27
Charlotte   569             25          2092                28
Chicago   537             23          1908                23
Cleveland   286              9          1212                  7
Dallas   446             17          1585                16
Denver   367             15          1260                10
Detroit   536             22          1644                18
GSW            97               1            894                  2
Houston   222               2            840                  1
Indiana   390             16          1772                 21
LA Clip   267               6          1209                   6
LA Lakers   796             29          2187                 30
Memphis   284               8          1247                   9
Miami   247               5          1092                   5
Milwaukee   322             13          1467                 14
Minnesota   356             14          1683                 19
New Orl   481             20          1969                 26
New York   518             21          1796                 22
Oklahoma   296             11          1331                 12
Orlando   626             26          2132                 29
Philadelph   557             24          1764                 20
Phoenix   633             27          1923                 24
Portland   457             18          1634                 17
Sacramen   836             30          1929                 25
San Anto   279              7            930                   3
Toronto   290             10           1034                   4
Utah           305             12           1334                 13
Washingto   243               4           1281                  11

Re: Please indulge me. Rankings
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2017, 08:45:12 PM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 47539
  • Tommy Points: 2404
Surprised by how high Miami are rated.

Re: Please indulge me. Rankings
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2017, 09:00:41 PM »

Offline bdm860

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5991
  • Tommy Points: 4593
This is the kind of thankless work that earns you a TP.

After 18 months with their Bigs, the Littles were: 46% less likely to use illegal drugs, 27% less likely to use alcohol, 52% less likely to skip school, 37% less likely to skip a class

Re: Please indulge me. Rankings
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2017, 09:10:46 PM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31869
  • Tommy Points: 10047
can't see how boston is #3 for their top 5 but Cleveland is #9.  that alone gives me pause to accept the credibility of the ratings

Re: Please indulge me. Rankings
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2017, 10:00:32 PM »

Offline jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13047
  • Tommy Points: 1763
  • Everybody knows what's best for you
can't see how boston is #3 for their top 5 but Cleveland is #9.  that alone gives me pause to accept the credibility of the ratings

Yeah, Lebron is better than our whole starting line-up. Without weighted rankings, it doesn't totally work; however, after you get past the superstars, it seems like a pretty interesting system.

Re: Please indulge me. Rankings
« Reply #5 on: June 12, 2017, 05:16:11 AM »

Offline Greyman

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 784
  • Tommy Points: 211
One of my main aims was to see what the Celtics would have to do to get close to GSW. Top 5 wise you really are pushing it even if you pick up a player like Davis. I also thought it would be interesting to see how a team like Philly improves through mostly natural growth.

Re: Please indulge me. Rankings
« Reply #6 on: June 12, 2017, 07:32:49 AM »

Online tazzmaniac

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8176
  • Tommy Points: 551
I'd suggest doing a top 3 also.  Not weighted rankings but it would help account for the impact of stars. 

Re: Please indulge me. Rankings
« Reply #7 on: June 13, 2017, 01:11:57 AM »

Offline Greyman

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 784
  • Tommy Points: 211
I'd suggest doing a top 3 also.  Not weighted rankings but it would help account for the impact of stars.

It's a good idea. I might not have the time for a little while but I will get to it.