That strikes me as a false dichotomy. Why wouldn't you: Draft Fultz and sign Hayward (a vet who can score 25 ppg)?
Is this what folks around here think of Hayward? No wonder everyone has an unreasonable fixation on acquiring him.
Hayward averaged 22 ppg this season, far and away his best. For his seven-season career, he's averaged 18 pp36 (20 over his last three seasons). All this on a Utah roster where he's had to "share" the scoring burden with the likes of George Hill, Derrick Favors, and Rodney Hood.
He's a decent piece, but he's not it. And you're definitely not getting a 25 ppg scorer, even if he's not playing next to Isaiah Thomas.
hhmmnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
I know this is not a thread about Howard, but I wonder to what extent we're suffering from an "other coast syndrome" (where we just don't see him play enough) and unrealistic expectation.
Hayward is, no doubt, a fundamentally sound player. I'm not sure he's all that dominant a scorer, and he's had a problem staying on the court (has played more than 77 games just once in seven seasons). I'm sure he'll be getting the max (because everyone seems to these days), but I'm definitely prepared to question whether that's particularly smart.
I agree, he's not the kind of transcendent scorer that wins titles.
He makes us better, but we're still not true contenders unless Fultz/Brown/Smart etc break out in a big way.