Author Topic: Updated Four Factors - BOS vs CHI  (Read 741 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Updated Four Factors - BOS vs CHI
« on: April 17, 2017, 04:09:44 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
A couple months ago I took a look at the Four Factors with respect to the Celts vs potential playoff opponents.

Those Four Factors, you probably recall, are as follows:

- Scoring efficiency (EFG% and Opponent EFG%)
- Rebounding (Offensive Rebound Rate and Defensive Rebound Rate)
- Turnovers (TO per 100 and Opponent TO per 100)
- Free Throws (FTM / 100 and Opponent FTM / 100)

To those FF, I added a measure for three pointers -- 3PM per game and Opponent 3PA per game.


Here's how the Celts stack up:


Offense

ORR - 24th

EFG% - 9th

FTM/100 - 9th

3PM - 3rd

TO / possession - 7th


Defense

DRR - 27th

OEFG% - 5th

O3PA - 14th

O. TO / possession - 16th

O. FTM / 100 - 25th


The Celts shoot well, get to the free throw line, hit a lot of threes, and don't turn the ball over too much.  They are a good offensive team despite getting very few offensive rebounds.

Defensively, they can't grab defensive boards, they don't force very many turnovers, they give up a lot of free throws, and they're about average at deterring three point attempts.  However, they do a good job of defending shots generally.


Here's how the Bulls stack up:


Offense

ORR - 4th

EFG% - 30th

FTM / 100 -14th

TO / per possession - 14th

3PM - 28th


Defense

DRR - 11th

O. EFG% - 10th

O. 3PA - 9th

O. TO - 19th

O. FTM/100 - 2nd


The Bulls are an awful offensive team.  They're the least efficient scoring team in the league and they don't hit very many three pointers at all.  However, they beast the offensive boards about as well as anybody, and they are about average at getting to the line.  They don't turn the ball over too often.

Defensively, they're solid, especially in terms of not sending opponents to the line.  They don't force very many turnovers, however.



What it means

Overall, the picture painted by these numbers is about what you would expect: the Celts are a far superior offensive team to the Bulls, but their weakness on the boards combined with the Bulls' strength on the offensive glass means the Bulls will probably have an edge in the possession battle.

The battle of the boards is the heart of this matchup.  The Celts only hope is to out-shoot the Bulls and try very hard not to give up too many free throws or offensive rebounds.  This Bulls team shouldn't have the firepower to out-score any decent playoff opponent, but the Celts are really bad about bailing opponents out by allowing second chances and sending shooters to the free throw line.

I don't have a great deal of confidence in the Celts to win the possession battle, so I think it'll ultimately come down to Celts role players getting hot from outside.  This is the reason that I didn't feel super confident about this matchup.


Last year, the story with this Celts team was that they forced a lot of turnovers to make up for the rebound disparity.  This year, they've instead tried to bury opponents with jumpshots and free throws.

These numbers were certainly borne out by how Game 1 of the series went.  Let's hope the Celts bring something new to the table for Game 2, or else they could find themselves sent home very early for a very long summer.

If Jimmy Butler continues to match or exceed Isaiah's 4th quarter production, there will be a great deal of pressure on Isaiah's teammates to step up to make the difference.  We haven't really seen anybody consistently do that over the course of the regular season, and nobody showed up to do so yesterday.

How the rest of this series plays out will go a long way toward answering whether the formula for success of this current Celts group is something that can be expected to work in the post-season. 

So far, the Isaiah Thomas / Brad Stevens Celts are 2-9 in the post-season.  There are plenty of caveats and explanations for why that might be, but the number stands all the same.  Great players and great coaches find ways to win games they shouldn't and prevail in series against equal or lesser opponents. 
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Updated Four Factors - BOS vs CHI
« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2017, 05:09:25 PM »

Offline loco_91

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2087
  • Tommy Points: 145
Nice analysis. The C's did get exposed on the boards last game. Part of the issue is boxing out, but also part of the issue is allowing too much penetration--we don't have guys who can help on the drive and then pull down the rebound. We should be going under screens and forcing the bulls to settle for jumpers. Another issue was that nobody was crashing boards after the initial offensive rebound, allowing them to get 3+ shots on several possessions.

Re: Updated Four Factors - BOS vs CHI
« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2017, 05:28:13 PM »

Offline tarheelsxxiii

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8593
  • Tommy Points: 1389
Interpretation does makes sense.  Pretty depressing, though. 
The Tarstradamus Group, LLC

Re: Updated Four Factors - BOS vs CHI
« Reply #3 on: April 19, 2017, 08:35:11 AM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
So I guess trying to win purely by outshooting your opponent was not the best game plan for a team with only one above average offensive talent.

:-/
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain