this whole thread is a joke. Celtics fans want this team to get the respect that comes with getting the 1 seed but none of the pressure and expectations that comes with it.
A *&%/ men !
context always matters.
Celtics fans want the respect for the 1 seed that Boston deserves for earning the 1 seed, but we must also understand the context.
The Celtics are a bad 1 seed. They do not deserve the same level of respect of past 1 seeds.
The Celtics also have a ton of room to grow. They can afford to lay an egg in these playoffs and not be doomed as a team. They have close to max cap space a 20 year old top 3 pick and an incoming top 4 pick. They can blow this chance and be OK.
They deserve less respect than past one seeds, and with it slightly lower expectations, but most importantly because of the bright future of the team, they do not deserve to face the same level of scrutiny that you would usually see if a 1 seed sucks in the playoffs.
also, it is management which I believe should be shielded from this criticism. players should be evaluated based on their individual expectations. If Crowder sucks for the series he should not be shielded from criticism because we have Jaylen Brown in the wings.
I don't know. If they lay an egg this postseason—which I'd define as losing the Bulls series—I think something at least semi-drastic may have to be done. This would be the third consecutive year of getting bounced in the first round, and this year doing it as the 1 seed; that's a pretty bad look. Though I do think you make a fair point about expectations being lower for these guys because they're not the "typical" 1 seed.
1) Overreaction, 2) what does semi-drastic mean? I have no idea what you're saying.
There's going to be natural roster turnover, and the Celtics are likely to make another FA signing, in addition to adding Zizic, Yabu, and a top 4 draft pick. That would mean 4 new players are likely to be on this team next year. Guys like Amir, KO, Green, and Young are probably gone.
What else are you suggesting?
To begin, you shouldn't call my statement an overreaction if you don't even know what I mean by "semi-drastic." You're making a claim about something that you admit to not fully understanding.
By "semi-drastic," I mean something less than selling off the farm, but still a significant shakeup. As you mentioned, there will be natural roster turnover; what I'm proposing is something that falls somewhere between natural turnover and, say, trading IT, Brown, Bradley, AND this year's BKN pick—for example, maybe trading one or two of those four.
Because if this team loses in the first round for the third consecutive year, it becomes clear that something needs to change. If, on the other hand, Boston turns this series around and ends up winning it, it will be difficult to argue that Danny should alter his course in any major way.