Let me ask you all something.
Paul Pierce is an overall better two-way player than IT, no question.
But even PP34 needed great help to get a championship.
Lebron and Curry need help too.
So why are people saying IT isn't worth a max for averaging 29/6 and why are people suggesting we trade IT for pieces instead of trying to actually build with him as a "piece" (not necessarily franchise superstar, but an all-star: sort of like what Irving is to James or Thompson/Green to Curry, etc.)
The whole "one step backward, two steps forward" narrative is also kind of overblown because as @coachbo mentioned above this comment, the C's without IT are likely a 7-8 seed at very best. Going from a 1 seed to like 7-8 is NOT just a "step backward"...