Poll: Would you trade #1 for #3 and #5?

[PhoSita]

I voted something else. I would propose the No. 1 for Willie Cauley Stein and the Sac lottery pick.

He is a clear upgrade on interior D, that will not get lost in switches. He boosts our rebounding and I reckon he will be smart enough not to be a black hole on offense (stick to setting hard screens, rolling to the basket and passing to an open teammate​ when on the floor)

Considering that the Sac pick is already subject to getting switched with Philly, that would probably mean trading #1 for WCS and a pick in the 5-7 range.

No thanks.

We have plenty of young role players.  If you get #1, take the guy you think has the best chance of  becoming a franchise cornerstone and don't look back.

[LatterDayCelticsfan]

I voted something else. I would propose the No. 1 for Willie Cauley Stein and the Sac lottery pick.

He is a clear upgrade on interior D, that will not get lost in switches. He boosts our rebounding and I reckon he will be smart enough not to be a black hole on offense (stick to setting hard screens, rolling to the basket and passing to an open teammate​ when on the floor)

Considering that the Sac pick is already subject to getting switched with Philly, that would probably mean trading #1 for WCS and a pick in the 5-7 range.

No thanks.

We have plenty of young role players.  If you get #1, take the guy you think has the best chance of  becoming a franchise cornerstone and don't look back.

Definitely a weak point for my proposal. Still if we somehow get a better lottery pick, or keep the No. 1 pick in the process of getting WCS, would you do it. As much as he may be a role player, he plays a role we need help in very badly

[kozlodoev]

Let's trade quality for quantity because we have too much of the former and not enough of the latter?

[CoachBo]

What we need are more underage project role players.

Easy vote: No.

[nickagneta]

There's no way a team would give up 3 and 5 in this draft for 1.  3 might be Ball or Fultz.  You might be able to do #1 and Jaylen Brown for #3 and #5, because 3 is a tiny downgrade from 1 and Brown is a significant downgrade from 5.   Might have to do #1 + Jaylen + Yabusele for 3 and 5.

I hope you are not a GM. Actually, I hope you are a GM with a lot of assets that is just anxious to deal with Danny Ainge.

I wish he was a GM in my fantasy basketball league.

[Dino Pitino]

I see Fultz/Ball/Jackson as a virtual tossup, so I would definitely take this deal and get an extra Monk or [insert top lottery prospect] for the trouble of having a tough three-way choice narrowed down by the opposition.

[Celtics4ever]

I might do it if Ball was off the board, because I don't want him on the team.