I think what some folks are missing about the pro trade IT argument is not that we think he is going to be traded or even is likely to be traded its that we acknowledge that he
could be traded and therefore have to explore what a trade like that could look like.
Most of us aren't calling for his head. We don't fail to see his value or are under the delusion that his defensive deficiencies stop him from being a great player. We get accused of underrating IT but I think many of us have him properly rated. He's an excellent player, who's deservedly seeking a max, that he might need to find somewhere else.
Isaiah plays at the deepest position in the league by far, a position that's value is constantly being redefined(Russell Westbrook isn't even considered the unanimous MVP for his historic production) and we have a high chance of drafting his logical successor in Markelle Fultz. Now we might not get Fultz but that doesn't mean we shouldn't discuss what an Isaiah trade might look like. This is a basketball blog.
Couple of points...
1.
To the 'we can't trade IT because he's the face of the franchise' crowd, I disagree with that logic. Danny Ainge is amongst the best GM's in the league at always trading a player to a great situation. Isaiah is looking to get paid the Max and start for a competitive team. IMO he cares more about this than bringing Boston banner 18 and I don't blame him for that.
If Danny moved IT to a place where he could finally feel the security that he's not going anywhere, get paid his max, and lead his team unquestioned night in and night out, I don't think IT would bear any ill-will toward the Celtics. If anything he would be forever grateful for being given the opportunity to finally prove what he was worth to the league.
2.
Trading Isaiah to hand the team over to Fultz does not make us the 76'ers. Most of us aren't saying sell off all the vets and bottom out until the Warriors break up and LeBron retires. But we're also not saying that this team is complete for that matter either.
We've got two more high draft picks and need to leave our options open for what that could mean for roster construction. If it took trading Isaiah as the final push into attaining a top-10 talent it would be bad business to keep him out of misguided loyalty.
3.
It's not trade IT or bust! There is absolutely a world where the best version of this team has Isaiah Thomas as its starting point guard. I can only speak for myself but I would not be upset if we signed IT to the max and locked him up as a Celtics Legend. Frankly I'd be ecstatic.
But I'd be disingenuous if I said that I felt that locking up IT is the only option. Having so many options is what made this post KG era team so great in the first place.
So until the ink is dry on Isaiah's extension I and others like me will continue to explore every one of these options, and if you disagree with that point, don't tell me that my point shouldn't be made... tell me why you disagree.