I have no idea if it is possible, but I would much rather have both Greg Monroe and Rudy Gay than either Hayward or Griffin.
We are really small and getting two high end role players at the 3-5 could be the answer.
Really? Explain why. I would love to hear your thoughts, also TP for being a new member, welcome, welcome! I mean Griffin, I can understand due to injury concerns, but why Gay?
Well, I subscribe to the school of thought that we need a mix of players at different points in their careers to get a sustained winning team. We are going to lose depth at the 4 and 5 this offseason either through our older players getting worn down or free agency or retirement. We are going to need to address that somehow. This draft doesn't seem to have a center or power forward worth taking in the top 4, so trades and free agency are the options. Monroe isn't as good as Hayward or Griffin, but he rebounds and passes well and is likely a good system fit.
Rudy Gay is a good player who already got overpaid once. He can play either forward position. He got traded a few times for his contract mainly. He is likely to have a chip on his shoulder from that and everyone calling him overpaid. To me that sounds like someone who could be a good fit.
Trying to get good vets now and stars from our draft picks isn't the worst idea. The veterans pass on knowledge and the new guys get better than they would have otherwise. In the meantime something like
Thomas
Bradley
Gay
Horford
Monroe
with a bench mob of
Crowder, Smart, Rozier, Brown, BKL '17, Olynyk, Zizic, Yabusele, Jackson, Nader (you probably can't keep Olynyk without a trade, so the bench is probably wishful thinking)
would have an outside shot and be fun to watch while still being in compete soon mode.