I like the positional fit of Jackson too, but if he's Jeff Green and Fultz is James Harden, you have to go with Fultz regardless of the logjam in the back court.
Sounds like you've never watched Jackson play. He is the opposite of Jeff Green.
I was referring to upside, not game.
Moreover, I'm not saying Jackson has Green's upside. I'm simply saying that some people seem more concerned about positional fit than upside on this board. And IF Fultz or Ball has better upside, we shouldn't take Jackson despite the fit.
I'm not sure what you're talking about, Jackson has as much upside as Ball or Fultz. Futlz has a lot of flash to his game, but people say he doesn't really make his team better. Ball might have the most upside with his passing, and potential on D, but his dad sounds like a pain in the butt, and he may be just like him.
But Jackson seems to do it all. Finds the open guy, shoots the outside shot, drives to the hoop, rebounds. His defense has gotten so good over the last month players don't want to go against him. During one of the broadcasts one of the analysts said one of the bigger named players(can't remember off the top of my head) didn't want to go against him because he's playing D so well.
Right now it's down to Fultz(who will get traded to the Bulls for Butler) or Jackson. I like Jackson, he really smooth on the floor and at 6'8" I think he could still play the 2. And if they decided to go full blow youth movement having your core of Smart,Jackson,Brown,Nets2018,Yabu,Zizic is a pretty good start.