0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Evantime34 on February 23, 2017, 01:17:54 PMThe rumors coming out make it seem like it is getting progressively more likely as time moves towards the deadline. When nothing happens I'm going to have the worst basketball related blue balls ever.What's the female version of blue balls? I might just burst into frustrated, inconsolable tears at my desk if nothing happens.
The rumors coming out make it seem like it is getting progressively more likely as time moves towards the deadline. When nothing happens I'm going to have the worst basketball related blue balls ever.
Quote from: foulweatherfan on February 23, 2017, 01:21:01 PMQuote from: triboy16f on February 23, 2017, 01:17:44 PMGuessing to Lakers for ingram , 2017 1st, clarksonThey can't trade their 2017 1st, Philly has the rights unless it's top 3, and if it is Philly has the rights to their 2018 pick. They could only trade their 2017 1st if they hit top 3 and it's draft night.They can trade their 2017 1st if they keep it, or 2018 if Philly gets 2017. Still dwarfed by the Nets pick.
Quote from: triboy16f on February 23, 2017, 01:17:44 PMGuessing to Lakers for ingram , 2017 1st, clarksonThey can't trade their 2017 1st, Philly has the rights unless it's top 3, and if it is Philly has the rights to their 2018 pick. They could only trade their 2017 1st if they hit top 3 and it's draft night.
Guessing to Lakers for ingram , 2017 1st, clarkson
Quote from: triboy16f on February 23, 2017, 01:17:44 PMGuessing to Lakers for ingram , 2017 1st, clarksonCan they trade their 2017 first at all, or can they simply say "2017 if it finishes 1,2 or 3?"Mike
I wonder if the Lakers could actually be in play here. Is Randle, Ingram, and a 1st more than Danny would offer?
Quote from: celticinorlando on February 23, 2017, 01:18:53 PMPacers are now said to be clearing roster spots...Three spots for Ingram, Russell and Randle? Mike
Pacers are now said to be clearing roster spots...
Quote from: foulweatherfan on February 23, 2017, 01:21:01 PMQuote from: triboy16f on February 23, 2017, 01:17:44 PMGuessing to Lakers for ingram , 2017 1st, clarksonThey can't trade their 2017 1st, Philly has the rights unless it's top 3, and if it is Philly has the rights to their 2018 pick. They could only trade their 2017 1st if they hit top 3 and it's draft night.But if they sent the 2017 pick to Indy, they wouldn't be able to convey the 2018 pick to Philly since a team can't trade consecutive first rounders. So I think that '17 pick is out of play for any new deal.
Quote from: saltlover on February 23, 2017, 01:23:06 PMQuote from: foulweatherfan on February 23, 2017, 01:21:01 PMQuote from: triboy16f on February 23, 2017, 01:17:44 PMGuessing to Lakers for ingram , 2017 1st, clarksonThey can't trade their 2017 1st, Philly has the rights unless it's top 3, and if it is Philly has the rights to their 2018 pick. They could only trade their 2017 1st if they hit top 3 and it's draft night.They can trade their 2017 1st if they keep it, or 2018 if Philly gets 2017. Still dwarfed by the Nets pick.Wouldn't that violate the Stepien Rule?
Quote from: mef730 on February 23, 2017, 01:20:31 PMQuote from: celticinorlando on February 23, 2017, 01:18:53 PMPacers are now said to be clearing roster spots...Three spots for Ingram, Russell and Randle? MikeThat works in the trade checker as well..I did it yesterday. If they throw in a first as well, this deal is a no brainer for Larry and Magic gets to make his mark with an insane deal but they would get their superstar. I would not put anything past Magic in this situation, He has a player who clearly wants to be in LA and the fans would love him for the next decade.. An overpay is the only way it will happen.
Quote from: Celtic Fan Forever on February 23, 2017, 01:17:54 PMI wonder if the Lakers could actually be in play here. Is Randle, Ingram, and a 1st more than Danny would offer?I don't want to get in a bidding war with the Lakers, who will probably sign him as a FA in a couple years anyway.
Lakers give up Randle, Russell and Ingram means there would be NOTHING left to build around George...don't think LA has nearly enough to give
Quote from: foulweatherfan on February 23, 2017, 01:23:46 PMQuote from: saltlover on February 23, 2017, 01:23:06 PMQuote from: foulweatherfan on February 23, 2017, 01:21:01 PMQuote from: triboy16f on February 23, 2017, 01:17:44 PMGuessing to Lakers for ingram , 2017 1st, clarksonThey can't trade their 2017 1st, Philly has the rights unless it's top 3, and if it is Philly has the rights to their 2018 pick. They could only trade their 2017 1st if they hit top 3 and it's draft night.They can trade their 2017 1st if they keep it, or 2018 if Philly gets 2017. Still dwarfed by the Nets pick.Wouldn't that violate the Stepien Rule?No, because they got Houston's 1st this year for Williams, so they'd still make a draft pick this year.