Author Topic: Why Aren't We After Kyle O'Quinn?  (Read 1990 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Why Aren't We After Kyle O'Quinn?
« Reply #15 on: February 22, 2017, 11:51:09 AM »

Offline Bobshot

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2050
  • Tommy Points: 141
I think they want a 5, not a 4. Looking more at Bogut or Okafor. Horford for the 4.

Re: Why Aren't We After Kyle O'Quinn?
« Reply #16 on: February 22, 2017, 12:07:09 PM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14480
  • Tommy Points: 976
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
Because, to put it shortly, he sucks. He also does not do anything we can't already get from Olynyk or Zeller.
or Zizic.

Re: Why Aren't We After Kyle O'Quinn?
« Reply #17 on: February 22, 2017, 12:47:12 PM »

Offline chilidawg

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2009
  • Tommy Points: 261
I think they want a 5, not a 4. Looking more at Bogut or Okafor. Horford for the 4.

Let's hope not, Horford is not a good defender at the 4.

Re: Why Aren't We After Kyle O'Quinn?
« Reply #18 on: February 22, 2017, 12:53:32 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
Because, to put it shortly, he sucks. He also does not do anything we can't already get from Olynyk or Zeller.
or Zizic.
Yeah. If you brought Zizic in today, I can't imagine him being materially worse than KO'Q.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."