Author Topic: George noncommital on Pacers extension; wants to play for "winning" team  (Read 11104 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: George noncommital on Pacers extension; wants to play for "winning" team
« Reply #30 on: February 17, 2017, 06:08:41 PM »

Online DefenseWinsChamps

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6051
  • Tommy Points: 766
That's fine if he doesn't want to play pf. Smart or crowder can.

Re: George noncommital on Pacers extension; wants to play for "winning" team
« Reply #31 on: February 17, 2017, 07:20:16 PM »

Offline seancally

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1097
  • Tommy Points: 119
Never really heard about the not playing PF story. Isn't he really a SG/SF though? I get that he is 6'9" but that doesn't mean he can play PF against most teams. Might be more to the story there behind the scenes.

Yeah - here's the story:

Players don't want to play a position up. It's hard and exacts a physical toll. Lebron didn't want to play the 4 (and, by the way, still doesn't, mostly) and he is certainly capable of it. Would be a nightmare. He's almost the same exact size as peak Karl Malone.

KG didn't want to play the 5. Why? Centers are bigger, stronger and harder to guard in the post / out-rebound than 4s (typically).

Carmelo doesn't want to play the 4. See James, Lebron.

This is nothing new and is not a red flag. He's a small forward and has carved out a tremendous role in that position. Of course he doesn't want to play a different position.

Plus, winning changes everything. Brad is a phenomenal coach. Paul George is not a starting 4, but will cover the 4 in spots and stretches. Would give flexibility against lineups that require a small 4.

Nobody is disputing that players don't want to play up a position, or criticizing Paul George for not wanting to play up a position.  The issue is that he will not play up a position, which is not something that any of the players you mentioned did (they may not have liked it, but they did it), and is absolutely a red flag

Oh for goodness sake.

I'm sure Paul George has logged minutes at the 4. I don't watch enough Pacers games nor am I savvy enough with Basketball Reference to know that for sure. But it seems very unlikely that he's never played the 4.

Furthermore: You know when those players I mentioned agree to play a position up? When they are in winning situations - when they realize their versatility is a key to success.

And in any case, I frankly don't care if Paul George will play the 4 or not. Sometimes he shouldn't play the 4, depending on the matchup. What matters is that he would become, at least, our best 2-way player, and it isn't even close. He's a matchup nightmare. I've gone to games when we've played his pacers and he is a real problem - a la Lebron.

Would he put us over the top? Make us contenders? Yes, he would. While playing small forward, at that. This bull of putting himself ahead of the team - true of many stars. True of many champions. True of plenty of guys stuck in situations they don't want to be in. I don't put stock in that at all.
"The game honors toughness." - President Stevens

Re: George noncommital on Pacers extension; wants to play for "winning" team
« Reply #32 on: February 17, 2017, 07:23:22 PM »

Offline Smokeeye123

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2374
  • Tommy Points: 156
If the deal is fair for both sides I see Bird letting him go to us.

Re: George noncommital on Pacers extension; wants to play for "winning" team
« Reply #33 on: February 17, 2017, 07:43:43 PM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 47555
  • Tommy Points: 2404
George is a SG/SF. I'd be intrigued by a line up of Thomas/George/Crowder/Horford/Olynyk(or Johnson).

I wonder if Bird would bite on Bradley, Zeller, Rozier, Mickey, the rights to Nader, BKN 2017, BOS 2019, MEM 2019 and what ever seconds. Still Keep Smart, Brown, BKN 2018.

Thomas/Smart/Jackson
George/Green/Young
Crowder/Brown
Horford/Jerbko/(Yabusele)
Johnson/Olynyk/(Zizic)

Agreed -- I really like P.George as a big 2 guard. Get that extra length out on the perimeter defensively. Make passing lanes difficult. That is the direction I would be putting P.George in more so than trying him at PF.

Re: George noncommital on Pacers extension; wants to play for "winning" team
« Reply #34 on: February 17, 2017, 08:10:11 PM »

Offline Yoki_IsTheName

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11134
  • Tommy Points: 1304
  • I'm a Paul Heyman guy.
George is a SG/SF. I'd be intrigued by a line up of Thomas/George/Crowder/Horford/Olynyk(or Johnson).

I wonder if Bird would bite on Bradley, Zeller, Rozier, Mickey, the rights to Nader, BKN 2017, BOS 2019, MEM 2019 and what ever seconds. Still Keep Smart, Brown, BKN 2018.

Thomas/Smart/Jackson
George/Green/Young
Crowder/Brown
Horford/Jerbko/(Yabusele)
Johnson/Olynyk/(Zizic)

Any deal that will involve Paul George would certainly involve Jaylen Brown.

It makes sense for Indiana to get a some sort of a "Paul George" replacement that they can develop.
2019 CStrong Historical Draft 2000s OKC Thunder.
PG: Jrue Holiday / Isaiah Thomas / Larry Hughes
SG: Paul George / Aaron McKie / Bradley Beal
SF: Paul Pierce / Tayshaun Prince / Brian Scalabrine
PF: LaMarcus Aldridge / Shareef Abdur-Raheem / Ben Simmons
C: Jermaine O'neal / Ben Wallace

Re: George noncommital on Pacers extension; wants to play for "winning" team
« Reply #35 on: February 17, 2017, 08:19:37 PM »

Offline D Dub

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3123
  • Tommy Points: 251
George is a SG/SF. I'd be intrigued by a line up of Thomas/George/Crowder/Horford/Olynyk(or Johnson).

I wonder if Bird would bite on Bradley, Zeller, Rozier, Mickey, the rights to Nader, BKN 2017, BOS 2019, MEM 2019 and what ever seconds. Still Keep Smart, Brown, BKN 2018.

Thomas/Smart/Jackson
George/Green/Young
Crowder/Brown
Horford/Jerbko/(Yabusele)
Johnson/Olynyk/(Zizic)

Agreed -- I really like P.George as a big 2 guard. Get that extra length out on the perimeter defensively. Make passing lanes difficult. That is the direction I would be putting P.George in more so than trying him at PF.
TP who and magic hat. 

Great trade proposal & philosophy on playing PG. 

Re: George noncommital on Pacers extension; wants to play for "winning" team
« Reply #36 on: February 17, 2017, 08:35:41 PM »

Offline tarheelsxxiii

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8593
  • Tommy Points: 1389
If George opts out this summer, what's the biggest contract he could get without re-signing with the Pacers. Does anyone know?

His option is for 2018-2019, not this summer.

salt, would it be feasible to max George at that point, assuming that IT is signed at the max and one (two would be amazing) of AB/Crowder/Smart can be reasonably paid?

It really depends what gets sent away for him.  Crowder is under contract for a few years yet, whereas Bradley and Smart aren't.  But I don't think you can have IT, George, and Horford all maxed in 2018 and keep both Smart and Bradley.  Could be difficult to do with even one.  Crowder and one of them should be possible, assuming we're also sending out 2017 Brooklyn.  There'd still be a sizable luxury tax bill, and Olynyk needs to be gone in such a situation as well.  I'd think the team would be about $15 million over the luxury tax with the following roster:

IT
George
Horford
Smart/AB
Crowder
Brown
2018 Brooklyn
Rozier
Yabusele
Zizic
2018 Celtics
Minimum salary the last four slots.

That's a luxury tax bill that approaches $30 million on top of about a $140 million payroll.  Tough to see the team going much higher than that.  I know people are willing to trade Crowder, but he's borderline unreplaceable from a salary perspective.

Thank you! Very helpful, as always.  Sounds like incorporating a third max player, if possible, forces one of AB/Smart/Crowder out.  And as you pointed out, Crowder (and prob Smart) are the best options moving forward, though my hat goes off to AB for his improvement.

I wonder if the FO are willing to pay a luxury tax.  Looks like in 08-09, they were willing to spend $8 million+ in luxury tax to compete for a championship.  $30 million does seem hefty, but if a team like CLE is willing to pay $54 million, maybe spending will be seen as a necessity.
The Tarstradamus Group, LLC

Re: George noncommital on Pacers extension; wants to play for "winning" team
« Reply #37 on: February 17, 2017, 08:37:34 PM »

Offline rondohondo

  • NCE
  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10756
  • Tommy Points: 1196
This trade makes a lot of sense if Indy wants to trade him

Bos sends : Crowder, zellar ,Rozier ,brk 17 , bos 18 , 2nd rd pickz
Indy sends : George


IT.            Smart
AB.          Smart/Jaylen
George.   Jaylen
Amir.        Jerebko
Horford.    KO

Would still have amir and Jerebko as salary if you also want to go after a Bogut type to fill out the big man rotation along with Horford and KO.   

Re: George noncommital on Pacers extension; wants to play for "winning" team
« Reply #38 on: February 17, 2017, 09:07:45 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48294
  • Tommy Points: 2932
How about this set of trades:

Boston: George, Miles

Indiana: Amir, Brown, Rozier, 2017 Brooklyn first swap, 2019 Memphis pick


Boston: Noel, protected future Philly first

Philly: Bradley

That leaves you with the following roster:

PG: IT, Smart
SG: George, Green/Young
SF: Crowder, Miles
PF: Horford, JJ
C: Noel, KO, Zeller

And it would still leave us with next year's 2018 Brooklyn draft pick, the Clips future protected pick, and a future protected pick from Philly. That's a championship roster right there with 6 elite shooters and at least 4 to 5 elite defenders, and I think that's a fair trade all around for both George and Noel.

Re: George noncommital on Pacers extension; wants to play for "winning" team
« Reply #39 on: February 17, 2017, 09:27:53 PM »

Offline cons

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1130
  • Tommy Points: 103
he could really change the culture of our club!
yay!

If Bird asks for too much...

Ainge: "Larry, do you really want to hurt me?  Do you really want to make me cry?"


haha! nice! TP

Re: George noncommital on Pacers extension; wants to play for "winning" team
« Reply #40 on: February 17, 2017, 09:29:54 PM »

Offline LilRip

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6860
  • Tommy Points: 392
How about this set of trades:

Boston: George, Miles

Indiana: Amir, Brown, Rozier, 2017 Brooklyn first swap, 2019 Memphis pick


Boston: Noel, protected future Philly first

Philly: Bradley

That leaves you with the following roster:

PG: IT, Smart
SG: George, Green/Young
SF: Crowder, Miles
PF: Horford, JJ
C: Noel, KO, Zeller

And it would still leave us with next year's 2018 Brooklyn draft pick, the Clips future protected pick, and a future protected pick from Philly. That's a championship roster right there with 6 elite shooters and at least 4 to 5 elite defenders, and I think that's a fair trade all around for both George and Noel.

I like it. And I think getting Brown + 2017 + Rozier is a good haul for George. Maybe I'd throw in a 2nd rounder as well if it's not enough. CJ Miles is a good backup and is a flamethrower on some nights.

Noel I'm on the fence. I can see why we need size after giving up Amir but realistically, can we keep Noel after this year once he hits FA? Maybe keep Brown and give Bradley instead? I don't know if the deal makes as much sense for the Pacers in that situation though.

- LilRip

Re: George noncommital on Pacers extension; wants to play for "winning" team
« Reply #41 on: February 17, 2017, 10:05:12 PM »

Offline bdm860

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5991
  • Tommy Points: 4593
Never really heard about the not playing PF story. Isn't he really a SG/SF though? I get that he is 6'9" but that doesn't mean he can play PF against most teams. Might be more to the story there behind the scenes.

Yeah - here's the story:

Players don't want to play a position up. It's hard and exacts a physical toll. Lebron didn't want to play the 4 (and, by the way, still doesn't, mostly) and he is certainly capable of it. Would be a nightmare. He's almost the same exact size as peak Karl Malone.

KG didn't want to play the 5. Why? Centers are bigger, stronger and harder to guard in the post / out-rebound than 4s (typically).

Carmelo doesn't want to play the 4. See James, Lebron.

This is nothing new and is not a red flag. He's a small forward and has carved out a tremendous role in that position. Of course he doesn't want to play a different position.

Plus, winning changes everything. Brad is a phenomenal coach. Paul George is not a starting 4, but will cover the 4 in spots and stretches. Would give flexibility against lineups that require a small 4.

Nobody is disputing that players don't want to play up a position, or criticizing Paul George for not wanting to play up a position.  The issue is that he will not play up a position, which is not something that any of the players you mentioned did (they may not have liked it, but they did it), and is absolutely a red flag

Oh for goodness sake.

I'm sure Paul George has logged minutes at the 4. I don't watch enough Pacers games nor am I savvy enough with Basketball Reference to know that for sure. But it seems very unlikely that he's never played the 4.

Furthermore: You know when those players I mentioned agree to play a position up? When they are in winning situations - when they realize their versatility is a key to success.

And in any case, I frankly don't care if Paul George will play the 4 or not. Sometimes he shouldn't play the 4, depending on the matchup. What matters is that he would become, at least, our best 2-way player, and it isn't even close. He's a matchup nightmare. I've gone to games when we've played his pacers and he is a real problem - a la Lebron.

Would he put us over the top? Make us contenders? Yes, he would. While playing small forward, at that. This bull of putting himself ahead of the team - true of many stars. True of many champions. True of plenty of guys stuck in situations they don't want to be in. I don't put stock in that at all.

According to bball-reference, George has played 13% at PF this year, and last year it was 39% in the regular season and 67% in Indiana's 7 playoff games.

Last year playoffs one of their main 5 man units was
PG: G Hill
SG: Ellis
SF: S Hill
PF: George
C: Turner/Mahinmi

This years 6 most popular 5 man unit is (have only played 64mins together though).
PG: Teague
SG: Ellis
SF: Miles
PF: George
C: Turner

After 18 months with their Bigs, the Littles were: 46% less likely to use illegal drugs, 27% less likely to use alcohol, 52% less likely to skip school, 37% less likely to skip a class

Re: George noncommital on Pacers extension; wants to play for "winning" team
« Reply #42 on: February 17, 2017, 10:13:19 PM »

Offline ssspence

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6375
  • Tommy Points: 403
How about this set of trades:

Boston: George, Miles

Indiana: Amir, Brown, Rozier, 2017 Brooklyn first swap, 2019 Memphis pick


Boston: Noel, protected future Philly first

Philly: Bradley

That leaves you with the following roster:

PG: IT, Smart
SG: George, Green/Young
SF: Crowder, Miles
PF: Horford, JJ
C: Noel, KO, Zeller

And it would still leave us with next year's 2018 Brooklyn draft pick, the Clips future protected pick, and a future protected pick from Philly. That's a championship roster right there with 6 elite shooters and at least 4 to 5 elite defenders, and I think that's a fair trade all around for both George and Noel.

Not a championship team. So why waste the assets? It's pure impatience.
Mike

(My name is not Mike)

Re: George noncommital on Pacers extension; wants to play for "winning" team
« Reply #43 on: February 17, 2017, 10:31:07 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48294
  • Tommy Points: 2932
How about this set of trades:

Boston: George, Miles

Indiana: Amir, Brown, Rozier, 2017 Brooklyn first swap, 2019 Memphis pick


Boston: Noel, protected future Philly first

Philly: Bradley

That leaves you with the following roster:

PG: IT, Smart
SG: George, Green/Young
SF: Crowder, Miles
PF: Horford, JJ
C: Noel, KO, Zeller

And it would still leave us with next year's 2018 Brooklyn draft pick, the Clips future protected pick, and a future protected pick from Philly. That's a championship roster right there with 6 elite shooters and at least 4 to 5 elite defenders, and I think that's a fair trade all around for both George and Noel.

Not a championship team. So why waste the assets? It's pure impatience.


Re: George noncommital on Pacers extension; wants to play for "winning" team
« Reply #44 on: February 17, 2017, 10:36:05 PM »

Offline ssspence

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6375
  • Tommy Points: 403
How about this set of trades:

Boston: George, Miles

Indiana: Amir, Brown, Rozier, 2017 Brooklyn first swap, 2019 Memphis pick


Boston: Noel, protected future Philly first

Philly: Bradley

That leaves you with the following roster:

PG: IT, Smart
SG: George, Green/Young
SF: Crowder, Miles
PF: Horford, JJ
C: Noel, KO, Zeller

And it would still leave us with next year's 2018 Brooklyn draft pick, the Clips future protected pick, and a future protected pick from Philly. That's a championship roster right there with 6 elite shooters and at least 4 to 5 elite defenders, and I think that's a fair trade all around for both George and Noel.

Not a championship team. So why waste the assets? It's pure impatience.



Cool. As you know, glad to hear it.
Mike

(My name is not Mike)