Author Topic: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)  (Read 87663 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #315 on: March 19, 2017, 07:25:06 PM »

Offline rondohondo

  • NCE
  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10756
  • Tommy Points: 1196
What a stud Jackson is.

Hoping we land him, I take him #1

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #316 on: March 19, 2017, 07:27:43 PM »

Offline blink

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18040
  • Tommy Points: 1469
yeah I hope DA was watching this game.  Jackson a huge difference maker.  Maybe I haven't seen Fultz play enough, but I don't see how he has a higher ceiling than Jackson.  Jackson just abusing Michigan State.

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #317 on: March 19, 2017, 07:31:21 PM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
Jackson blows by Bridges for dunk...game over...

23 pts today.  Kansas to face Purdue next - sweet 16

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjGLw246NOc

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #318 on: March 19, 2017, 07:36:20 PM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
yeah I hope DA was watching this game.  Jackson a huge difference maker.  Maybe I haven't seen Fultz play enough, but I don't see how he has a higher ceiling than Jackson.  Jackson just abusing Michigan State.

you bet he is...


Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #319 on: March 19, 2017, 07:46:25 PM »

Offline Smokeeye123

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2374
  • Tommy Points: 156
This is great for our pick. If Jackson emerges as a legitimate top pick contender it becomes more valuable. Maybe its now considered a 3 person draft.

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #320 on: March 19, 2017, 08:00:09 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 36776
  • Tommy Points: 2961
Remember James Young looked dang good too during his tournament.... ;D

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #321 on: March 19, 2017, 08:13:31 PM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
Remember James Young looked dang good too during his tournament.... ;D

We dont know how decent Young is , as CBS does not play him

The times we have seen him this season, he has performed quite nicely... then goes back to th bench

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #322 on: March 19, 2017, 08:29:47 PM »

Offline Boris Badenov

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5227
  • Tommy Points: 1065
Remember James Young looked dang good too during his tournament.... ;D

We dont know how decent Young is , as CBS does not play him


You don't think one thing has something to do with the other?

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #323 on: March 19, 2017, 08:30:37 PM »

Offline Denis998

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3308
  • Tommy Points: 388
  • Rutgers '17
Josh was great out there today, especially the time when the team fed him the ball. Is it just me or does he seem to be bigger than 6'8?

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #324 on: March 19, 2017, 08:41:42 PM »

Offline footey

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15965
  • Tommy Points: 1833
This is great for our pick. If Jackson emerges as a legitimate top pick contender it becomes more valuable. Maybe its now considered a 3 person draft.

Several of us (cfan60's, triboy, me, among a few others) have been touting this kid for over a month.

Jackson is a basketball player. Very high IQ. Even when he is having an off game he still figures out how to help the team. Really hope we draft him. My one worry is that he will rise to become the consensus number 1 pick, and we wont hold the pick.  Almost wishing he would have a bad game and exit tourney early. Lay low in the weeds. Ha ha.

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #325 on: March 19, 2017, 08:45:11 PM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8595
  • Tommy Points: 842
This is great for our pick. If Jackson emerges as a legitimate top pick contender it becomes more valuable. Maybe its now considered a 3 person draft.

Several of us (cfan60's, triboy, me, among a few others) have been touting this kid for over a month.

Jackson is a basketball player. Very high IQ. Even when he is having an off game he still figures out how to help the team. Really hope we draft him. My one worry is that he will rise to become the consensus number 1 pick, and we wont hold the pick.  Almost wishing he would have a bad game and exit tourney early. Lay low in the weeds. Ha ha.
eh. ball Fultz and Tatum are also great prospects.
Quote from: George W. Bush
Too often, we judge other groups by their worst examples while judging ourselves by our best intentions.

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #326 on: March 19, 2017, 08:57:30 PM »

Offline Ogaju

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19479
  • Tommy Points: 1871
So its official its a two man draft? Jackson and Fultz.

Do we have a Fultz thread?

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #327 on: March 19, 2017, 09:02:52 PM »

Offline A Future of Stevens

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2524
  • Tommy Points: 486
So its official its a two man draft? Jackson and Fultz.

Do we have a Fultz thread?

Yea its an on again off again flame thread where people talk about how their binkies are better than Fultz. Alot of Fultz supporters have kind of moved on in regards to how good Fultz is. Everybody knows he is good at everything.
#JKJB

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #328 on: March 19, 2017, 09:10:01 PM »

Online jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 47948
  • Tommy Points: 2906
http://www.espn.com/espn/now?nowId=21-0635279468079881622-4

Long time NBA GM says there's probably 4 number one picks in this draft (Fultz, Ball, Jackson, and Tatum). That's GREAT for our pick. I still prefer Fultz, but I'd probably be fine with Jackson or Tatum, too. I'm just not really a fan of Ball.

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #329 on: March 19, 2017, 09:11:50 PM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20000
  • Tommy Points: 1323
Quote
Yea its an on again off again flame thread where people talk about how their binkies are better than Fultz. Alot of Fultz supporters have kind of moved on in regards to how good Fultz is. Everybody knows he is good at everything.

Except winning, let the excuses begin and they ignore his knees.   

I would have liked to see him in the Tourney but his team did not make it there.   There are other young teams that made it.   So nix that one, the team not being good is one that I hear most in regards to their poor record.