Author Topic: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)  (Read 88035 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #390 on: March 31, 2017, 01:30:15 PM »

Offline The One

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2017
  • Tommy Points: 203
Josh Jackson: Why NBA Teams Are Tanking This Year by BBALLBREAKDOWN

Needs to improve - shot and handle...but has potential to be a really good player.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xVQiKtLCio

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #391 on: March 31, 2017, 01:47:33 PM »

Online footey

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15968
  • Tommy Points: 1833
Josh Jackson: Why NBA Teams Are Tanking This Year by BBALLBREAKDOWN

Needs to improve - shot and handle...but has potential to be a really good player.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xVQiKtLCio

TP, that's a really good scouting report.

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #392 on: April 04, 2017, 05:42:08 PM »

Offline Big333223

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7500
  • Tommy Points: 742
Currently NBADraft.net has Jackons #1 and going to the Celtics. I think this is the first big draft site that I've seen that doesn't have Fultz going #1.
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #393 on: April 04, 2017, 05:51:15 PM »

Offline Denis998

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3308
  • Tommy Points: 388
  • Rutgers '17
Currently NBADraft.net has Jackons #1 and going to the Celtics. I think this is the first big draft site that I've seen that doesn't have Fultz going #1.
nbadraft.net is a scam. Possible the worst mockdraft site around. It seems like they rank the prospects based off of name mentions from a google search.

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #394 on: April 04, 2017, 06:06:46 PM »

Offline Big333223

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7500
  • Tommy Points: 742
Currently NBADraft.net has Jackons #1 and going to the Celtics. I think this is the first big draft site that I've seen that doesn't have Fultz going #1.
nbadraft.net is a scam. Possible the worst mockdraft site around. It seems like they rank the prospects based off of name mentions from a google search.
To your point, they've also got De'Aaron Fox #4, ahead of Jason Tatum. Only place I've seen that, too.
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #395 on: April 04, 2017, 06:10:15 PM »

Offline Quetzalcoatl

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4098
  • Tommy Points: 419
Currently NBADraft.net has Jackons #1 and going to the Celtics. I think this is the first big draft site that I've seen that doesn't have Fultz going #1.
nbadraft.net is a scam. Possible the worst mockdraft site around. It seems like they rank the prospects based off of name mentions from a google search.

Josh Jackson is rated a "100" prospect on there and Fultz is a "99", so it's not even for fit purposes.  That being said, NBAdraft.net is the worst site on the internet for this stuff.

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #396 on: April 04, 2017, 07:34:45 PM »

Offline A Future of Stevens

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2533
  • Tommy Points: 486
Thought I would throw up Jackson's Draft Express extended scouting report videos for the good folks of Cs blog here.

Strengths - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDAwfVf8jfQ

Weaknesses - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YCqOIlHx9g

He has easily worked his way into the 2nd best player in this draft in my book. His off the ball movement and activity is just so refreshing to see from a player with his athletic gifts.
#JKJB

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #397 on: April 04, 2017, 08:16:34 PM »

Offline Big333223

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7500
  • Tommy Points: 742
Thought I would throw up Jackson's Draft Express extended scouting report videos for the good folks of Cs blog here.

Strengths - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDAwfVf8jfQ

Weaknesses - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YCqOIlHx9g

He has easily worked his way into the 2nd best player in this draft in my book. His off the ball movement and activity is just so refreshing to see from a player with his athletic gifts.
Yeah, I've got him ahead of Ball, too. There's just something about Ball that makes me nervous his game won't translate when he's playing against bigger, stronger, faster defenses. I could be totally wrong, but I worry.
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #398 on: April 04, 2017, 08:27:53 PM »

Offline chambers

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7482
  • Tommy Points: 943
  • Boston Celtics= Championships, nothing less.
Jackson could be a nice player.
The hitch in his jumpshot is awful though and he is often way out of control going to the rim.
Defensive awareness and ability are probably the best in this draft.

Fultz is just a way better player on the offensive end and it puts him on his own in the franchise potential category for me.

Jackson is also more than a year older than most of these guys.

"We are lucky we have a very patient GM that isn't willing to settle for being good and coming close. He wants to win a championship and we have the potential to get there still with our roster and assets."

quoting 'Greg B' on RealGM after 2017 trade deadline.
Read that last line again. One more time.

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #399 on: April 08, 2017, 10:42:37 AM »

Offline Royrebirth

  • Oshae Brissett
  • Posts: 68
  • Tommy Points: 9
I 0% think DA would draft JJ. JJ is the type of player DA likes, but I'd say more than that, DA has shown a preference for high-character individuals. With the crime and controversy that surfaced surrounding JJ, I don't think we take him.

You might think of Smart as an exception, but I think the scenario was vastly different.

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #400 on: April 08, 2017, 10:59:28 AM »

Online footey

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15968
  • Tommy Points: 1833
I 0% think DA would draft JJ. JJ is the type of player DA likes, but I'd say more than that, DA has shown a preference for high-character individuals. With the crime and controversy that surfaced surrounding JJ, I don't think we take him.

You might think of Smart as an exception, but I think the scenario was vastly different.

Oh please. Crime and controversy? Not saying he's an angel, but you're not drafting him because he kicked a car and left scene of hitting a parked car?  Cmon.

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #401 on: April 09, 2017, 06:34:46 PM »

Offline Royrebirth

  • Oshae Brissett
  • Posts: 68
  • Tommy Points: 9
double post

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #402 on: April 09, 2017, 06:35:04 PM »

Offline Royrebirth

  • Oshae Brissett
  • Posts: 68
  • Tommy Points: 9
I 0% think DA would draft JJ. JJ is the type of player DA likes, but I'd say more than that, DA has shown a preference for high-character individuals. With the crime and controversy that surfaced surrounding JJ, I don't think we take him.

You might think of Smart as an exception, but I think the scenario was vastly different.

Oh please. Crime and controversy? Not saying he's an angel, but you're not drafting him because he kicked a car and left scene of hitting a parked car?  Cmon.

"TULSA, Okla. (AP) — One day before top-seeded Kansas opens NCAA Tournament play, court officials released an affidavit that said freshman star Josh Jackson threatened to “beat” a women’s basketball player during a confrontation in December."

http://www.denverpost.com/2017/03/16/josh-jackson-kansas-threatened-woman/

Ainge has a history of liking high character individuals – why we didn't take DMC for example. See here for more:

http://www.celticsblog.com/2015/7/27/9053791/celtics-building-a-cast-of-high-character-guys

When the top 4-5 players are all so good, I think every "little" bit matters, even the intangibles.

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #403 on: April 09, 2017, 07:19:17 PM »

Online footey

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15968
  • Tommy Points: 1833
I 0% think DA would draft JJ. JJ is the type of player DA likes, but I'd say more than that, DA has shown a preference for high-character individuals. With the crime and controversy that surfaced surrounding JJ, I don't think we take him.

You might think of Smart as an exception, but I think the scenario was vastly different.

Oh please. Crime and controversy? Not saying he's an angel, but you're not drafting him because he kicked a car and left scene of hitting a parked car?  Cmon.

"TULSA, Okla. (AP) — One day before top-seeded Kansas opens NCAA Tournament play, court officials released an affidavit that said freshman star Josh Jackson threatened to “beat” a women’s basketball player during a confrontation in December."

http://www.denverpost.com/2017/03/16/josh-jackson-kansas-threatened-woman/

Ainge has a history of liking high character individuals – why we didn't take DMC for example. See here for more:

http://www.celticsblog.com/2015/7/27/9053791/celtics-building-a-cast-of-high-character-guys

When the top 4-5 players are all so good, I think every "little" bit matters, even the intangibles.

An affidavit is meaningless. You act like it was a judgment.

Re: Josh Jackson Thread (Merged)
« Reply #404 on: April 09, 2017, 10:03:56 PM »

Offline Royrebirth

  • Oshae Brissett
  • Posts: 68
  • Tommy Points: 9
Hey footey, I am in no way trying to be belligerent with you – I value your opinion, and this is just what I think.

But an affidavit is literally a sworn statement before the criminal justice system, which actually holds weight in court. These statements are consistent with his misdemeanor in destruction of property / vandalism – he was actually charged for the vandalism which came after he made these threats to that same girl whose property he vandalized.