0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Fultz is generally considered Russell + athleticism.
Fultz all they way. Not sure there is anything Russell does significantly better than Fultz. Fultz is a better athlete, he drives and finishes at the rim much better and he's a better defender. Russell probably wouldn't be a top 5 pick in this draft. The Lakers best prospect is Ingram not Russell.
Quote from: max215 on January 21, 2017, 03:26:51 PMFultz is generally considered Russell + athleticism.Can you explain the athleticism part? Fultz is a smooth operator. But it's not like he is able to blow by guys or finish with a thunderous dunk.... actually i haven't even seen him dunk yet or finish above the rim at the ncaa levelfor this reason I think Russell, Beal, McCollum (not saying Fultz won't be better) comparisons are better than comparing Fultz to say Harden...
Quote from: triboy16f on January 21, 2017, 03:30:40 PMQuote from: max215 on January 21, 2017, 03:26:51 PMFultz is generally considered Russell + athleticism.Can you explain the athleticism part? Fultz is a smooth operator. But it's not like he is able to blow by guys or finish with a thunderous dunk.... actually i haven't even seen him dunk yet or finish above the rim at the ncaa levelfor this reason I think Russell, Beal, McCollum (not saying Fultz won't be better) comparisons are better than comparing Fultz to say Harden...Fultz isn't an elite athlete but he's a very good athlete. He doesn't dunk much but he doesn't need to because he's an elite below the basket finisher. His athleticism shows in his 1.4 blocks per game. This highlight shows why Fultz is the #1 pick even has a few dunks for you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cA9Uw6Fhm6Y
Too often, we judge other groups by their worst examples while judging ourselves by our best intentions.
Quote from: tazzmaniac on January 21, 2017, 03:17:01 PMFultz all they way. Not sure there is anything Russell does significantly better than Fultz. Fultz is a better athlete, he drives and finishes at the rim much better and he's a better defender. Russell probably wouldn't be a top 5 pick in this draft. The Lakers best prospect is Ingram not Russell. Not only that, but I think that Fultz is a better pure PG than Russel. I'm not saying in any way that Fultz is a pure/pass first PG because he's definitely a scoring point, but he's just a more creative passer and approaches the pick and roll looking to make plays for not only himself, but also for his teammates which is something I can't say with Russell.
Fultz is better than Russell already. Isnt the OP a Ball fan?