Two starters missing (Al and Jae) - GS, Cleveland
One starter missing (IT) - Tor, OKC, SAS
One starter missing (AB) - Tor
Other losses by points - SAS (6), Houston (1), OKC (5), Cleveland (8 )
Given our injuries and the context of us playing these teams early in the season around all of the injuries and during our difficult road-heavy schedule, this isn't too bad of a record. Including the injury games, the GS game was the only one that wasn't a close game in the final minutes. Hell, we technically shouldn't have lost to Houston because the refs' review screwed us over by wrongly reviewing AB's 3 as a 2, which would've made it a tie game.
If it wasn't for injuries, which also pushed back us developing chemistry, we probably take half of these games.
who was missing from those other teams in those games? I seem to recall SAS playing without Aldridge in one of the games, Toronto hasn't had Sullinger all year and was without Carroll in one of the games, JR Smith was out for the 2nd Cavs game, etc.
Major, major difference in missing a Sullinger, Smith, or even Carroll than missing IT or Al AND Jae for us. In every single instance, we had more of an impact of missing a guy than the opponent.
The only one that is close is Aldridge, but that was the Spurs game that IT missed, who is much more crucial to us than Aldridge is to them. Similarly, Carroll missed the game that IT missed, which is once again a major disadvantage to us still. And Sullinger for them doesn't equate to any of our guys, so I don't think this is a particularly strong argument that you are making.