I mean, he and his camp have all but made public trade demands over the last few months, lol.
Last night was just Noel's 1st 2nd game back but I thought Brett Brown bungled the situation. In the 1st half Noel played 2 four minute stretches without Embiid or Noel which wasn't bad. In the 2nd half, Noel didn't play at all even though there was a 4 or 5 minute stretch where Embiid and Okafor weren't on the floor.
Having their 3 bigs isn't optimal but it doesn't take rocket science to work out a decent rotation where Embiid gets 28min and Okafor and Noel get at least 20min each. At least one of their bigs should be on the court at all times. Illyasova should not be getting 27 minutes when all three of their bigs are available. The Noel/Embiid combo needs to be used quite a bit as it projects to be their best big combo. Okafor/Embiid should be used too. I would avoid playing the Okafor/Noel combo.
You're saying this like Ilyasova isn't by far the best floor spacer they have among their bigs. Embiid/Okafor shouldn't be played more; it's a bad combination.
This situation isn't Brown's fault by any means; he doesn't have an optimal big rotation. One of the three bigs has to go. It simply isn't tenable to keep all three and there's no use in pretending that it can work.
Who said anything about keeping all three? The point is they have all three of them now so Brown needs to do a better job getting them all playing time. They need Noel playing 20min+ so they can get a reasonable return for him before the deadline. There is no excuse for having a 4 minute period with Embiid, Okafor and Noel all on the bench. There is no excuse for not trying out the Noel/Embiid combo. Embiid/Okafor is better than Illyasova/Okafor.
They play like trash together. Brown can "do a better job" of getting them all playing time, but it's not going to help the team. His concern is with trying to help the team win games, not appease individual players by playing them as often as they feel they should be played.
That entire organization is a mess right now, and it's all directly a result of "the process." And Brown is somewhat guilty, too, though it was obviously management that put him in this situation to begin with.
There's been at least a dozen posters here who have called this from the start. You simply can't draft three starting-caliber centers consecutively who aren't versatile in their playing positions and expect to truly develop them.
This whole Embiid/Okafor pairing seems fishy, though, and it seems like it's coming from management rather than Brown. Why would they even try that when Simmons seemingly has the 4 spot locked up already? Do they expect to play Simmons at the 3 or what?
As Brown has said, Simmons will be their PG running their offense. On defense, he'll mostly defend the 3 or 4 depending on who else is on court. They've already played Saric some at the 3 when Embiid and Okafor are on the court.
That means he'll function as the 3 or 4 in the lineup building. So I guess you could say it could go Embiid, Okafor, Simmons at the 5, 4, 3, but that lineup seems destined to fail. The Embiid/Okafor pairing has already been terrible together, and Embiid is already complaining about having to play out on the perimeter with that lineup. Adding another non-shooter to the mix will only make things worse.
They might try some different lineups out, but it seems clear that they'll be best at Guard, Guard, Covington, Simmons, Embiid, which actually projects to be a decent young frontcourt. I just don't see Okafor as anything but a backup in Philly, unless Embiid is hurt.