Would you send this package for Hayward

[Tr1boy]

To Jazz: Brown, KO, Zeller, 2 2nd round picks
To Celtics: Hayward, Withey, Ingles

*Resign Hayward to 5 year 125 million dollar extension

Celtics lineup

Horford
Amir
Hayward
AB
IT

2017 lineup

Horford
Giles
Hayward
AB
IT

Yay or nay?

[Who]

Yes

[mmmmm]

No.

If Hayward wants to be a Celtic and the Celtics want him to be here we can sign him as a free agent next Summer.

It makes no sense to give up Jaylen Brown for someone who will be a free agent in 7 months.

If we do trade for him, in order to get his help on the roster this year, it should be for a much more modest package.

[Roy H.]

In a second.

[Tr1boy]

No.

If Hayward wants to be a Celtic and the Celtics want him to be here we can sign him as a free agent next Summer.

It makes no sense to give up Jaylen Brown for someone who will be a free agent in 7 months.

If we do trade for him, in order to get his help on the roster this year, it should be for a much more modest package.

Too greedy... And how will Brown get any playing time/develop with Hayward and Crowder in the roster??

[CoachBo]

As quickly as I can dial the telephone ...

[TrueFan]

We will regret trading Brown.

[crimson_stallion]

I don't really get the purpose of bringing Hayward here with our current lineup.  Where does he fit in?

We have Thomas, we have Bradley (who is playing tremendous this year), and we have Crowder who is almost as good as Hayward at a fraction of the cost.

Would we start Hayward at SF and then move Crowder to the bench, not sure that's a move Crowder would accept very humbly.  He's worked hard to earn his role on this team and seems to be a proud guy.

It only seems to make sense to trade for Hayward if Crowder goes out in return, as I don't really see those two guys coexisting...and given the choice I would kinda rather have Crowder and risk losing him rather then have Horford and Hayward (two nice compimentary / secondary sem-stars) making a combined $40M+

[Tr1boy]

I don't really get the purpose of bringing Hayward here with our current lineup.  Where does he fit in?

We have Thomas, we have Bradley (who is playing tremendous this year), and we have Crowder who is almost as good as Hayward at a fraction of the cost.

Would we start Hayward at SF and then move Crowder to the bench, not sure that's a move Crowder would accept very humbly.  He's worked hard to earn his role on this team and seems to be a proud guy.

It only seems to make sense to trade for Hayward if Crowder goes out in return, as I don't really see those two guys coexisting...and given the choice I would kinda rather have Crowder and risk losing him rather then have Horford and Hayward (two nice compimentary / secondary sem-stars) making a combined $40M+

Hayward and crowder are close?

Hayward is much more talented on the offensive end.. no comparison... All Jae can do is do spot shooting or straight line drives... No ability to create shots. No midrange game. Barely gets to the line... So not sure what you mean they are close

In addition i dont really care if Crowder is going to sulk going back to the bench... Thats what will happen if this trade went through.

[Moranis]

why would Utah do this?

[Csfan1984]

No

[Tr1boy]

why would Utah do this?

Bc he is not staying another year in Utah after this season.

[Surferdad]

Nuh-uhh.  Brown is going to be special.

[bknova]

Other than the fact that I fully agree that Brown is going to be better player, and cheaper in the near term, the team's biggest need is rebounding. And Gordon Hayward is NOT going to fix that. 

[TrueFan]

Nuh-uhh.  Brown is going to be special.

Exactly. Time to tap the brakes on any Jaylen Brown trade proposals until we see his full potential.