They are, in my opinion, Horford (.582 TS%), Crowder (.621 TS%), and Olynyk (.600 TS%).
Horford is attempting 12.6 FGA which is far behind AB's 15.4 and IT's 18.8.
Crowder is under 10 FGA a game, and somehow ties with Marcus Smart, which is mind-boggling to me (Smart also averages a full FTA more!!).
Kelly has full-on decided to take the backseat to Smart in the 2nd unit, Marcus takes 3 and a half more shots per game.
How do we solve this? While at the same time not hurting IT and AB, who aren't inefficient scorers themselves?
I guess one suggestion would be to reduce our 11 man rotation to more of an 8 man rotation. Amir, Rozier, and Zeller average a combined 14.3 FGA per game. I'd give at least 6 of those to Horford and split the rest between Crowder and KO.
I understand the theory behind having a varied attack, but varying between 11 guys is a little ridiculous, and I'm not sure how it really helps us. Especially considering Zeller and Rozier bring basically nothing to the game other than scoring, and both hurt us defensively.
I'd much rather give Horford and Crowder larger scoring roles, giving us 4 huge scoring threats as opposed to just IT and AB. Then with Smart and KO in off the bench, there's no reason we can't have 4 double digit scorers in the game at all times, with Jaylen or Jerebko (who has a .604 TS%) filling in as the 5th glue guy.
IT (35) / Smart (13)
AB (35) / Smart (13)
Crowder (25) / Smart (6) / Brown (17)
Jerebko (24) / Crowder (9) / KO (15)
Horford (33) / KO (15)
It's time for us to make a push and put our record on par with the Cavs.