I was more willing to trade the 2016 Nets pick for Okafor, because it was widely called a 2 player draft and Okafor was widely seen as a better prospect than anyone available after Ben Simmons (some had Ingram ahead of him, though).
Obviously AInge agreed, because he reportedly offered a package built around the 2016 pick for Okafor at the trade deadline and Philly declined.
This year is a little different. It's still early, but I've read there's at least 5 guys in this draft with legitimate star potential. Hearing some very positive things about this draft. Some are saying it's "loaded" with talent. Based on a couple articles I skimmed, I got the impression that a tier3/4 prospect like Jaylen Brown would go no higher than 10th in the 2017 draft. So we're potentially talking about a very different situation here than last season when Ainge offered a package built around the 2016 pick for Okafor. When Ainge made that offer, there was still a chance the pick could have ended up #1 and net a real upgrade in Simmons, but it was still more likely to fall in the 3-5 range where Okafor was clearly a better prospect. Can't blame Philly for turning that one down. You don't trade a bluechip prospect for an unknown scratch ticket that most likely would end up a weak prospect.
I don't follow College ball enough to have a firm opinion on this upcoming draft. It's still early. But if it's true that we're looking at possible 5 superstars and 5-10 guys with more potential than Jaylen Brown (Okafor-level prospects), then I'd definitely rather keep the 2017 pick.
My only fear is that when Jeremy Lin comes back, the Nets go on a run and push themselves outside the bottom 5-10. So far, the Nets are undefeated in games where Jeremy Lin played and Brook Lopez got 25+ minutes. So hopefully they stay ravaged by injuries and the idea of moving the 2017 Nets pick for Okafor doesn't go from "plausible" to "pipe dream".