Author Topic: Markelle Fultz Thread (Merged)  (Read 14965 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Markelle Fultz Thread (Merged)
« Reply #225 on: March 31, 2017, 02:36:10 AM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5563
  • Tommy Points: 584
You're wrong.
There's no way jackson gets better at shooting. Even if he does, tatums shooting is already years advanced ahead of jackson even as Tatum is younger

Look at kevin durant. He couldn't do 1 rep at the camp For 180 lbs as a rookie. 
http://www.espn.com/nba/draft2007/news/story?id=2894925
According to the Times, Durant was the only prospect at camp who failed to bench press 185 pounds, and finished behind Oden in some key drills, including the vertical leap, agility drill and three-quarter court sprint.
Oden jumped 34 inches in the vertical leap while Durant jumped 33 inches, completed the agility drill in 11.67 seconds to Durant's 12.33 seconds, and finished the three-quarter court sprint in 3.27 seconds, ahead of Durant's 3.45 seconds, according to the report.

Now Durant is very strong and fast.
Meanwhile, the list of bad shooters who stay as bad shooters is longer than those who became good.shooters.
strength can absolutely be improved, but I think a player is far more likely to fix their jumper than they are substantially improve their quickness or explosiveness.
Quote from: George W. Bush
Too often, we judge other groups by their worst examples while judging ourselves by our best intentions.

Re: Markelle Fultz Thread (Merged)
« Reply #226 on: March 31, 2017, 04:39:59 AM »

Offline CelticsElite

  • Marcus Smart
  • Posts: 224
  • Tommy Points: 15
You're wrong.
There's no way jackson gets better at shooting. Even if he does, tatums shooting is already years advanced ahead of jackson even as Tatum is younger

Look at kevin durant. He couldn't do 1 rep at the camp For 180 lbs as a rookie. 
http://www.espn.com/nba/draft2007/news/story?id=2894925
According to the Times, Durant was the only prospect at camp who failed to bench press 185 pounds, and finished behind Oden in some key drills, including the vertical leap, agility drill and three-quarter court sprint.
Oden jumped 34 inches in the vertical leap while Durant jumped 33 inches, completed the agility drill in 11.67 seconds to Durant's 12.33 seconds, and finished the three-quarter court sprint in 3.27 seconds, ahead of Durant's 3.45 seconds, according to the report.

Now Durant is very strong and fast.
Meanwhile, the list of bad shooters who stay as bad shooters is longer than those who became good.shooters.
strength can absolutely be improved, but I think a player is far more likely to fix their jumper than they are substantially improve their quickness or explosiveness.
Fair enough. In the end, the draft is just another gamble where luck is involved in the process of who is a star and who isnt

Re: Markelle Fultz Thread (Merged)
« Reply #227 on: April 04, 2017, 09:25:48 AM »

Offline vjcsmoke

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2058
  • Tommy Points: 103
I feel like the thing that is underestimated about Fultz is that wingspan.   With that 6'10 wingspan it is really, really hard to bother his shot.  He can shoot those jumpers at will.  And he is so crafty and good at creating space that it's almost an impossibility to bother his shot.

He may not have Wall-level athleticism, but he appears to have Harden-level athleticism.  The ability to change gears, the elusiveness and handle to create his own shot.  That will drive defense nuts more than just straight line speed.

And to top that all off, his passing is incredible.  Because the defense must respect his shot and his ability to dribble to create his shot, it becomes even more devastating when he passes it to the open man.  You know the way Horford has made our shooters even more efficient with his great passing as a big man?  Add Fultz to the equation and we might just "break the game".  It's the TILT sign on the pinball machine.  It would be a LOT of fun to watch Fultz added to this offense and see how Stevens could utilize him.

Defensively he has the tools to deny and bother opposing guards.  6'10 wingspan, high steal and block rate for his position.  Just needs to learn how to lockdown and he would have able mentors to go against every day in practice in Bradley and Smart.

I gotta say, even if Guard isn't a need, if we land the #1 pick, we have to pick Fultz.  He's the definition of mismatch.  And in a world where shooters are favored, he could have a Curry-like or Harden-like impact for our team!

Re: Markelle Fultz Thread (Merged)
« Reply #228 on: April 26, 2017, 11:21:16 PM »

Offline Future Celtics Owner

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2516
  • Tommy Points: 142
  • Celtic's only raise championship Banners
I feel like the thing that is underestimated about Fultz is that wingspan.   With that 6'10 wingspan it is really, really hard to bother his shot.  He can shoot those jumpers at will.  And he is so crafty and good at creating space that it's almost an impossibility to bother his shot.

He may not have Wall-level athleticism, but he appears to have Harden-level athleticism.  The ability to change gears, the elusiveness and handle to create his own shot.  That will drive defense nuts more than just straight line speed.

And to top that all off, his passing is incredible.  Because the defense must respect his shot and his ability to dribble to create his shot, it becomes even more devastating when he passes it to the open man.  You know the way Horford has made our shooters even more efficient with his great passing as a big man?  Add Fultz to the equation and we might just "break the game".  It's the TILT sign on the pinball machine.  It would be a LOT of fun to watch Fultz added to this offense and see how Stevens could utilize him.

Defensively he has the tools to deny and bother opposing guards.  6'10 wingspan, high steal and block rate for his position.  Just needs to learn how to lockdown and he would have able mentors to go against every day in practice in Bradley and Smart.

I gotta say, even if Guard isn't a need, if we land the #1 pick, we have to pick Fultz.  He's the definition of mismatch.  And in a world where shooters are favored, he could have a Curry-like or Harden-like impact for our team!
TP on the wingspan. Also, he has a 8'6''-8'7'' standing reach; which for a pg(or even sg) is insane  and will help him get his jumper off over other players.

As far as pg's go Fultz is the longest and most talented I have seen come into the draft. His length should make him a terror defensively.

Re: Markelle Fultz Thread (Merged)
« Reply #229 on: April 26, 2017, 11:45:39 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • Larry Bird
  • *****************************
  • Posts: 29707
  • Tommy Points: 2491
I love when draftniks get sooooo much into the measurables on players and forget that these players actually have to play the game. IT has horrible measurables. AB does too. KO's aren't much better. But all three, all these years later are measured by talent and production. Maybe we should put more stock in ability to play the game and less in measurables? Does Fultz or any prospect have the talent to make the most of his body?  Thats the question we should be asking and stop drooling over measurables.

Re: Markelle Fultz Thread (Merged)
« Reply #230 on: Yesterday at 12:05:05 AM »

Online csfansince60s

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4559
  • Tommy Points: 678
I love when draftniks get sooooo much into the measurables on players and forget that these players actually have to play the game. IT has horrible measurables. AB does too. KO's aren't much better. But all three, all these years later are measured by talent and production. Maybe we should put more stock in ability to play the game and less in measurables? Does Fultz or any prospect have the talent to make the most of his body?  Thats the question we should be asking and stop drooling over measurables.

Tp, Exactly.

Which is why Ball is overlooked by too many here.

The guy is a winner with classic intangibles.

People think Fox dominated him TWICE. They're wrong.

That first game when UCLA went into Rupp, Fox dominated the first 10 minutes. After that, Ball LED his team back to beat KY in Lexington, highlighted by a fadeaway 3 to end the first half.


No easy feat beating 'Cats at home. Ball did it.