Hypothetically-speaking, if Myers called Ainge and offered Thompson for Bradley, JJ, and the Memphis pick, would you do it?
Reasoning:
Small sample size, but Klay has been pretty terrible so far this year, and he clearly looks to be the odd man out in the group. Further, his contract, while actually pretty excellent in the current NBA Salary climate, could hurt them a bit when trying to re-sign Steph and/or Durant this summer. And Klay's contract runs an extra year past Bradley's contract, with no early options or anything like that.
Bradley, on the other hand, has never been better. He's coming off of an All-Defensive 1st team selection, and he's lighting up the NBA at the moment, though at an unsustainable level.
Comparing the two, Klay is definitely the better offensive player, but when both sides of the ball are considered, they're closer than most people would think, even with Klay's above average defense. This is especially true when you consider Bradley's ball-hawking ability and its usefulness to a Golden State team that will have to go through a Western Conference playoffs with Westbrook, Paul, and Lillard, let alone Irving, IT, and Lowry from the East (the most likely Eastern contenders). And while Thompson is best as a high-usage player, Bradley is effective as a low-usage player that will hit open shots when given them.
To me, this is one of the rare trades where I think both sides actually benefit and get better. Bradley is an absolutely perfect fit at the 2 in Golden State, and Thompson would be a very good fit for us at the 2/3 here. He'd give us the extra scorer that we've been lacking, along with improving our three point shooting even more.
I'd even go as far as Bradley, JJ (who also would be a valuable and versatile sub for them on a bench that is pretty shallow), and the Memphis pick for Klay. However, I probably wouldn't do more than that, because I think Klay will ultimately be hurt the most by the addition of Durant, as is being shown now.
Would you do it?