All I know is that Boston's been hurt by bad rebounding waaaay too many times in the last decade, and I hope that changes this year.
The numbers and rankings of the 2008 Celtics title team compared to last years Celtics.
Regular season
Off. Reb.% Def. Reb.%
07/08 26.6(17T) 74.4(8.)
15/16 25.1(9T) 74.6(25T)
Last years C's were slightly better than the title team on the defensive end % wise, slightly worse on the offensive end. What you should be hoping for is the C's to score more efficiently (which they certainly should this year) resulting in fewer rebounding opportunities for their opponents. I wouldn't expect their rebounding percentages to go up strictly because of how Brad chooses to use his big men. All of Horford/K.O./Jerebko and even Amir will spend a lot of time on the perimeter offensively, and defending the perimeter and transition on defense. It is far more valuable to do so and sacrifice a few rebounds in the process.
If I am reading those stats correctly (# is the percentage of possible opportunities the team had to rebound the ball) then I find an interesting trend is apparent.
This past year we were a hair better at defensively rebounding the ball, but compared to everyone else in the league we were tied for 25th best. For offensive rebounding we were significantly worse, but compared to our peers we were better than that respective title year.
Very interesting trends happening in the nba.
More threes league-wide, and the Celtics foul a lot.