I have not seen anyone else make this point and there is no "Trade for Cousins" thread, so I'm posting this here.
So look at this:
2017 first round draft pick to Chicago
Sacramento's 1st round pick to Chicago (via Cleveland) protected for selections 1-10 in 2017; if this pick falls within its protected range and is therefore not conveyed, then Sacramento will instead convey its 2017 2nd round pick to Chicago protected for selections 56-60 (if this pick falls within its protected range and is therefore not conveyed, then Sacramento's obligation to Chicago will be extinguished) [Cleveland-Sacramento, 6/30/2011; Chicago-Cleveland, 1/7/2014]
http://basketball.realgm.com/nba/draft/future_drafts/detailedSo basically, they have every incentive to tank next year and it's a totally loaded draft. They seem to be inexplicably lining themselves up for the 11th or 12th pick right now though! If they just tank this year, they only give up a second rounder.
If we traded them Smart + Amir + 2017 BK, then they could roll something like this out to start 2018:
PG: Markelle Fultz / Temple
SG: Marcus Smart / McLemore
SF: Jonathan Issac / Matt Barnes
PF: WCS / Casspi / Tolliver
C: Georgios Papagiannis / Koufos
Now that's a real team, right? This is also assuming that they trade Rudy Gay and get a pick back or something. They could even do better than that and get Jackson or Giles. That team above is a
conservative guess at what they'd end up with. Isn't that better than keeping Cousins and not getting a draft pick? What am I missing here? They'd have cap space galore on top of that.