I take it back , I tried to make it seem like i totally hated this signing which I do
I overexaggerated purposely just to make it known how awful i think this signing is
obviously guys like Solomon Hill who got signed for 54 million are just one of the few horrific signings
but im just saying, Horford is one of the most annoying players ever. He is not good at all, and I feel a heavy decline almost immediately.
This is better than your initial post. The reason you are being attacked and being forced to go on the defensive is because you made such strong assertion in your OP and didn't back it up with anything except that you are usually right and it is proven by Smith/Steimsma.
Perhaps before you start a new thread that you know will likely get a negative reaction, you should be a little softer with your stance - ie, "Is the Horford Signing Really a Good One?" and then back it up either using multiple other other contracts that you believe to be good or bad as well as reasons / statistics of why you think he will decline.
It's not that you have no point (although I am in the heavy majority that likes the signing, sees it as a way to draw additional FAs, and thinks he will age gracefully with a growing, successful team), it's that your point was too harsh, a little conceited, and contained little substance.