Author Topic: terrible signing for Celtics = Horford  (Read 4850 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: One of the worst signings in history = Horford
« Reply #15 on: July 07, 2016, 08:20:27 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48140
  • Tommy Points: 2922
i assume you have a limited perspective of the game of basketball, then.

I am usually right.

Im not the one who wants to sign Stemsa to a NBA deal like the majority wanted.

It's hilarious how one game = everything to some people.

All I know is Horford not only isn't that good of a player, but he will not make this team better. He might make it worse.

Generally, people that have to tell others that they're usually right are usually wrong. You could take a lesson from Socrates here.

Re: One of the worst signings in history = Horford
« Reply #16 on: July 07, 2016, 08:20:30 PM »

Offline alldaboston

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4170
  • Tommy Points: 324
i assume you have a limited perspective of the game of basketball, then.

I am usually right.

Im not the one who wants to sign Stemsa to a NBA deal like the majority wanted.

It's hilarious how one game = everything to some people.

All I know is Horford not only isn't that good of a player, but he will not make this team better. He might make it worse.

You're citing Greg freakin Stiemsma as evidence that you're usually right? Hahahahah
I could very well see the Hawks... starting Taurean Prince at the 3, who is already better than Crowder, imo.

you vs. the guy she tells you not to worry about

Re: One of the worst signings in history = Horford
« Reply #17 on: July 07, 2016, 08:21:43 PM »

Offline alldaboston

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4170
  • Tommy Points: 324
This same guy said the Celtics shouldn't need Russell Westbrook. Give me a break.
I could very well see the Hawks... starting Taurean Prince at the 3, who is already better than Crowder, imo.

you vs. the guy she tells you not to worry about

Re: One of the worst signings in history = Horford
« Reply #18 on: July 07, 2016, 08:22:30 PM »

Offline dreamgreen

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3558
  • Tommy Points: 182
i assume you have a limited perspective of the game of basketball, then.

I am usually right.

Im not the one who wants to sign Stemsa to a NBA deal like the majority wanted.

It's hilarious how one game = everything to some people.

All I know is Horford not only isn't that good of a player, but he will not make this team better. He might make it worse.

Generally, people that have to tell others that they're usually right are usually wrong. You could take a lesson from Socrates here.

I don't know, I love telling people "I told you so"! ;D

Re: One of the worst signings in history = Horford
« Reply #19 on: July 07, 2016, 08:23:14 PM »

Offline celtics2030

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1437
  • Tommy Points: 72
This same guy said the Celtics shouldn't need Russell Westbrook. Give me a break.

I don't get It, am I bad for not wanting a point guard like Westbrick on the team?

Does he guarantee a championship or more tickets?

Re: One of the worst signings in history = Horford
« Reply #20 on: July 07, 2016, 08:24:44 PM »

Offline kraidstar

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5389
  • Tommy Points: 2478
I cannot believe it

Last year I was laughing at how trash he was and now we sign him

unbelievable.. he is one of my most hated players. When he makes shots I am baffled at how they go in, sort of like how I used to laugh at Josh Smith's shots when he was being loved by every fan and gm in the league. Absolutely disgusting.
You can hate him but if you think this is one of the worst signings in history you are really really not thinking about other signings.  Not worst signing this season by all teams.  Not worst signing in Celtics history or last 20 years for that matter.

not even the worst signing in the last 24 hours. i look at it this way. mozgov is getting $16M per year, austin rivers is getting $12M per year. horford costs the same as both combined, $28M per year.

so would you rather have rivers + mozgov, or just horford?

i'll take the latter please.

Re: One of the worst signings in history = Horford
« Reply #21 on: July 07, 2016, 08:24:50 PM »

Offline ABOS (A bit of Sanity)

  • Joe Mazzulla
  • Posts: 133
  • Tommy Points: 13
This same guy said the Celtics shouldn't need Russell Westbrook. Give me a break.

I don't get It, am I bad for not wanting a point guard like Westbrick on the team?

Does he guarantee a championship or more tickets?

Since you seem to a very unique perspective on what's good for this team enlighten everyone as to what you want the team to do or should have done in FA?

Re: One of the worst signings in history = Horford
« Reply #22 on: July 07, 2016, 08:25:49 PM »

Offline arctic 3.0

  • NCE
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2554
  • Tommy Points: 406
I used to run construction crews.

We'd hire a few kids every year as gofers. Never failed that one would show up on site and offer suggestions on how to do things better.
Usually I'd tell em to go ahead and do it their way.
After a few hours the good ones  would suck it up and ask for help fixing what they're done, the others would walk away and find another career.

This kind of reminds me of that.

Armchair GM's

Re: One of the worst signings in history = Horford
« Reply #23 on: July 07, 2016, 08:26:02 PM »

Offline Scintan

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3066
  • Tommy Points: 656
Troll thread?


When people are free to do as they please, they usually imitate each other.

Re: One of the worst signings in history = Horford
« Reply #24 on: July 07, 2016, 08:26:20 PM »

Offline BitterJim

  • NGT
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8926
  • Tommy Points: 1212
This same guy said the Celtics shouldn't need Russell Westbrook. Give me a break.

I don't get It, am I bad for not wanting a point guard like Westbrick on the team?

Does he guarantee a championship or more tickets?

Since you seem to a very unique perspective on what's good for this team enlighten everyone as to what you want the team to do or should have done in FA?

Based on former posts of his, I think he would have liked trading Smart for Elfrid Payton
I'm bitter.

Re: One of the worst signings in history = Horford
« Reply #25 on: July 07, 2016, 08:27:37 PM »

Offline cltc5

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7054
  • Tommy Points: 445
Welcome to bipolar blog.  Don't worry next year half the people will agree with u ::)

Re: One of the worst signings in history = Horford
« Reply #26 on: July 07, 2016, 08:27:58 PM »

Offline celtics2030

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1437
  • Tommy Points: 72
I take it back , I tried to make it seem like i totally hated this signing which I do

I overexaggerated purposely just to make it known how awful i think this signing is

obviously guys like Solomon Hill who got signed for 54 million are just one of the few horrific signings


but im just saying, Horford is one of the most annoying players ever. He is not good at all, and I feel a heavy decline almost immediately.

Re: One of the worst signings in history = Horford
« Reply #27 on: July 07, 2016, 08:28:36 PM »

Offline celtics2030

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1437
  • Tommy Points: 72
This same guy said the Celtics shouldn't need Russell Westbrook. Give me a break.

I don't get It, am I bad for not wanting a point guard like Westbrick on the team?

Does he guarantee a championship or more tickets?

Since you seem to a very unique perspective on what's good for this team enlighten everyone as to what you want the team to do or should have done in FA?

Based on former posts of his, I think he would have liked trading Smart for Elfrid Payton

Point is? lol

Re: One of the worst signings in history = Horford
« Reply #28 on: July 07, 2016, 08:29:50 PM »

Offline max215

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8448
  • Tommy Points: 624
I agree! Worst singing ever!!!












Not.
Isaiah, you were lightning in a bottle.

DKC Clippers

Re: One of the worst signings in history = Horford
« Reply #29 on: July 07, 2016, 08:30:07 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
i assume you have a limited perspective of the game of basketball, then.

I am usually right.

Im not the one who wants to sign Stemsa to a NBA deal like the majority wanted.

It's hilarious how one game = everything to some people.

All I know is Horford not only isn't that good of a player, but he will not make this team better. He might make it worse.
Either you're joking or you don't really understand basketball.

Best medicine for a fan who doesn't totally understand the game of basketball is some highlight videos... so here you go:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGAPmPDhMjY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLLLUhXxaVQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMbPu-4lYVU

That should do the trick.

Lol highlight video's.

Yes those will do it lol.
I'm gonna guess those 5-10 minutes of highlight videos would basically double the amount of time you've spent over your life focusing on Al Horford's impact.

And don't tell me the, "I watch Atlanta every time they play Boston".   Nobody pays attention to the other team when they watch their guys.   You were too busy watching Thomas and Crowder to notice Al HOrford lead his team past the Celtics in 6 quick games during the playoffs this year.