Total Members Voted: 48
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
No and it's not even close. Thunder have no leverage.
Quote from: BudweiserCeltic on July 04, 2016, 03:39:19 PMFirst of all, no extension will be agreed to. There's no money incentive for Westbrook to do that at all...Well, guess I'll just leave it at that. What you're suggesting is an impossibility to occur.(I also hate him...)I'm fuzzy on the extension rules, so someone would have to verify. But I read that by agreeing to an extension he could up his current salary by roughly $8M to up where Durant's would have been (26.6 or wherever) due to the cap space that they have now. Wouldn't that work for an extend and trade for us? Couldn't he just extend his contract for one year and become a free agent in 2018 instead of 2017, giving him around $8M more a year while only adding one more year to his contract to give us a bit of a safety net?I'm sure he'd rather do that and be on a winning team than have to stay on OKC all year or be traded to a team where they'd struggle to even make the playoffs, like the Lakers.
First of all, no extension will be agreed to. There's no money incentive for Westbrook to do that at all...Well, guess I'll just leave it at that. What you're suggesting is an impossibility to occur.(I also hate him...)
what in the world... wait, maybe you meant Cousins..
Westbrook is overrated. Bad fit. Biggest usage rating in the league and he's extremely inefficient. It's basically Rondo if Rondo jacked up 20 shots per night. Durant was carrying them. Our offense (top 5 in the league last season) is built around ball movement and shooting. We don't want a 42% shooter who bricks 29% from three taking 20+ shots per night.
Quote from: LarBrd33 on July 04, 2016, 03:44:29 PMWestbrook is overrated. Bad fit. Biggest usage rating in the league and he's extremely inefficient. It's basically Rondo if Rondo jacked up 20 shots per night. Durant was carrying them. Our offense (top 5 in the league last season) is built around ball movement and shooting. We don't want a 42% shooter who bricks 29% from three taking 20+ shots per night.I wouldn't say he is extremely inefficient. He is a stat machine. 50% from 2 and 80% from the line. In a better system he would get better 3pt shots as well so the fg% would go up. He is also a nightmare iso player. We know what Cavs did with LeBron and Irving ISOs. Without Turner in the fold who is that guy in the 4th quarter right now? He is also a superior athlete who can capitalize on fastbreaks that the D of AB, Crowder and Hordford would create. I'm all for Westbrook and IT as a six man.
Quote from: Csfan1984 on July 04, 2016, 04:09:08 PMQuote from: LarBrd33 on July 04, 2016, 03:44:29 PMWestbrook is overrated. Bad fit. Biggest usage rating in the league and he's extremely inefficient. It's basically Rondo if Rondo jacked up 20 shots per night. Durant was carrying them. Our offense (top 5 in the league last season) is built around ball movement and shooting. We don't want a 42% shooter who bricks 29% from three taking 20+ shots per night.I wouldn't say he is extremely inefficient. He is a stat machine. 50% from 2 and 80% from the line. In a better system he would get better 3pt shots as well so the fg% would go up. He is also a nightmare iso player. We know what Cavs did with LeBron and Irving ISOs. Without Turner in the fold who is that guy in the 4th quarter right now? He is also a superior athlete who can capitalize on fastbreaks that the D of AB, Crowder and Hordford would create. I'm all for Westbrook and IT as a six man.his efficiency was inflated because he played with arguably the most gifted offensive player in the league. When durant sat, Westbrook bricked more. I wouldn't count on him being successful in the type of system brad runs.
Quote from: tankcity! on July 04, 2016, 03:54:31 PMNo and it's not even close. Thunder have no leverage.What do you mean? You think we're giving up too much or what?