$23.5m per isn't bad at all. That's disappointing.
It's beyond dissapointmenting
Now we have to try and throw something like $26m at a declining glorified role player in Al Horford...very depressing considering Howard could have been a real difference maker here.
Anmoys me because im pretty sure he would have come here if he was the top priority, but the morons who are the Boston Celtics management decided to make it publicly obvious that Al Horford is their priority...prob oushed Dwight away
Sorry to compound the issue, but $113M / 4 is $28.25M, not $26M. I was also on board with Dwight over Horford, but if somehow we do walk away with Durant, this will be the reason.
I like that Danny is trying to go all in. It likely won't work, but he sure is trying!
I agree Howard would have improved us, but I'm not sure he'll ever be a starter on a title winner with is FT shooting, so I can live with the decision to prioritize Horford.
Especially if the reports are true, and Horford really is on KD's go-get list.
This is the year to swing for the fences in FA, and Danny is doing just that. Should we strike out, we still are a solid team and we'll get to see if this kid Brown can help us get to 50 wins.
The free throw shooting is a non-issue. Yet another thing that people over-dramatise.
Shaq was historically famous for being a terrible free throw shooter - may I ask how many titles he has won as a starting center?
Utilise him properly and Dwight Howard is going to give you somewhere between 16/11 and 18/12 while also anchoring your defence and intimidating opponents away from even trying to get to the basket against you...and he's proven that he performs on the playoff stage.
Horford will give you 15 and 8 if you're lucky, and has proven he folds like an origami duck in the playoffs - but we'd choose him (for more money) because he can hit free throws?
Cmon man!
Dwight will be THE man in Atlanta, since they kinda have nobody else now. With the extra touches he gets there his numbers are going to skyrocket...and if Boston and up with Horford (and don't get Durant along with him) they are going to look like the biggest bunch of morons this world has seen.
Don't get me wrong, we are in desperate need for an upgrade in the front-court, and Horford would undoubtedly make us better...but at what cost?!? Looking at Horford's production the last couple of seasons (and watching how he moves on the court) I can see a definite decline in his game, and I must admit I am scared to hell of the idea of locking him up to max dollars over four years. I don't see him playing at his current fringe-all-star level for more than another two seasons at most.
I guess at the prices guys are getting right now, we don't have much choice...just frustrating knowing we probably could have had Dwight, and have most likely lost him because of a preference for Al Horford, which is likely based entirely on the long-shot of him bringing Durant with him,