Author Topic: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (20-62, #1)  (Read 348150 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-35, #1 on 1/23)
« Reply #1485 on: January 24, 2017, 12:07:05 PM »

Offline mef730

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4441
  • Tommy Points: 915
First thought today: The Nets aren't playing tonight, so I don't have to be glued to the TV.

Second thought today: Oh, wait, the Celtics are on.

Priorities in order? Not so much.

Mike

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-35, #1 on 1/23)
« Reply #1486 on: January 24, 2017, 12:56:54 PM »

Offline GreenShooter

  • NCE
  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1177
  • Tommy Points: 87
If the Lakers keep losing and wind up with the first pick, they'll likely select Lonzo Ball. I call "fix is in" if that happens.

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-35, #1 on 1/23)
« Reply #1487 on: January 24, 2017, 01:02:04 PM »

Offline The One

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2017
  • Tommy Points: 203
If the Lakers keep losing and wind up with the first pick, they'll likely select Lonzo Ball. I call "fix is in" if that happens.

I think they trade it for Boogie.

Re: The Official 2016
« Reply #1488 on: January 24, 2017, 01:18:03 PM »

Online SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 36886
  • Tommy Points: 2968
Boston should reverse tank and give the Lakers another win when we play them...
did this notion of losing to the Lakers actually get posted here?  talk about a post that would inspire the reinstatement of giving negative TPs

that is a win SlamKing... you have to think critically here. Any Laker win is a LOSS for the Lakers.

In the world of tanking a win is a loss and vice versa.

Peeking in on Lakers blogs .  There seem to be more joy over losing than winning games.    The days of a big market team cheating small market teams out of their star draft picks are over.   Lakers pretty much have to rebuild like anyone else now .    Lakers fans screaming we aren't use to losing for long periods ...my thought .....too bad ...so sad .     Walton s pedigree does not allow him to be a willing tanker . 

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-35, #1 on 1/23)
« Reply #1489 on: January 24, 2017, 06:42:19 PM »

Offline clevelandceltic

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 583
  • Tommy Points: 30
Boston should reverse tank and give the Lakers another win when we play them...
The day the Celtics lose to the Lakers on purpose is the day I stop being a Celtic fan and NBA watcher

This deserves a thousand TPs

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-35, #1 on 1/23)
« Reply #1490 on: January 24, 2017, 09:28:20 PM »

Offline libermaniac

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2856
  • Tommy Points: 377
Sixers are going to win again.

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-35, #1 on 1/23)
« Reply #1491 on: January 24, 2017, 09:31:58 PM »

Offline tazzmaniac

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8163
  • Tommy Points: 550
Sixers are going to win again.
And they're doing it without Embiid.  Looks like Noel and Richaun Holmes, their 4th string center, both had good games. 


Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-35, #1 on 1/23)
« Reply #1492 on: January 24, 2017, 09:34:53 PM »

Offline hpantazo

  • Kevin McHale
  • ************************
  • Posts: 24928
  • Tommy Points: 2703
Sixers are going to win again.
And they're doing it without Embiid.  Looks like Noel and Richaun Holmes, their 4th string center, both had good games.

Saric had a great game for them tonight.

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-35, #1 on 1/23)
« Reply #1493 on: January 24, 2017, 09:43:51 PM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31869
  • Tommy Points: 10047
Boston should reverse tank and give the Lakers another win when we play them...
did this notion of losing to the Lakers actually get posted here?  talk about a post that would inspire the reinstatement of giving negative TPs

that is a win SlamKing... you have to think critically here. Any Laker win is a LOSS for the Lakers.

In the world of tanking a win is a loss and vice versa.
no, it's a loss.  a very bad loss.  C's getting wins has a direct impact on their positioning for the playoffs.   C's have no vested interest in the Laker pick, only the Nets pick.  If Lakers keep their pick from the Sixers this year, they're still a long way from getting near a playoff spot in the near and probably not-so-near future.

I don't care what the situations are for either team when they play.  the only thing that matters is beating the Lakers both at home and in LA.   no exceptions to that golden rule

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-35, #1 on 1/23)
« Reply #1494 on: January 25, 2017, 08:46:08 AM »

Offline mef730

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4441
  • Tommy Points: 915
Big game tonight, #1 vs. #2. A Miami win tonight would be a big lift.

Other games: Dallas hosting Knicks, Portland hosting Lakers.

Last night's last-second Phoenix loss moved them into a tie for 2nd with Miami. They've still got a shot.

Mike

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-35, #1 on 1/23)
« Reply #1495 on: January 25, 2017, 07:00:40 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48218
  • Tommy Points: 2929
Big game with Miami at Brooklyn tonight.

If Miami beats Brooklyn tonight, is it fair to conclude that Miami is no longer a threat to overtake the Nets as the worst team/record in the league? That would put Brooklyn at 9-36 and Miami at 16-30, a full 7 wins above the Nets and 6.5 games in the standings.

I already think that LAL is the biggest threat to the Nets over the Heat, since the Lakers will be outright tanking from here on out, and even at that I think there's a 90% possibility of the Nets ending with the worst record in the NBA in April over the Lakers.

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-35, #1 on 1/23)
« Reply #1496 on: January 25, 2017, 07:33:56 PM »

Offline Big333223

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7508
  • Tommy Points: 742
Big game with Miami at Brooklyn tonight.

If Miami beats Brooklyn tonight, is it fair to conclude that Miami is no longer a threat to overtake the Nets as the worst team/record in the league? That would put Brooklyn at 9-36 and Miami at 16-30, a full 7 wins above the Nets and 6.5 games in the standings.

I already think that LAL is the biggest threat to the Nets over the Heat, since the Lakers will be outright tanking from here on out, and even at that I think there's a 90% possibility of the Nets ending with the worst record in the NBA in April over the Lakers.
It's funny how fast the Lakers fell. I think most of us figured the Lakers' .500 start was fool's gold but it's taken no time at all to get them into the #2 position in the lottery.
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-35, #1 on 1/23)
« Reply #1497 on: January 25, 2017, 09:57:06 PM »

Offline libermaniac

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2856
  • Tommy Points: 377
Waiters!!!!!!!

3 pointer.  Heat all the way back to take 4 point lead with 6 to go!!!

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-35, #1 on 1/23)
« Reply #1498 on: January 25, 2017, 10:01:26 PM »

Offline trickybilly

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5600
  • Tommy Points: 618
Mmm, just smelling fultzy these days..

Hassan Whiteside 21 mins, 1 rebound, 1 block  :o
"Gimme the ball, gimme the ball". Freddy Quimby, 1994.

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (9-35, #1 on 1/23)
« Reply #1499 on: January 25, 2017, 10:02:44 PM »

Offline SCeltic34

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16184
  • Tommy Points: 2003
Wow.  Wasn't Miami down double digits heading into the 4th?  I was busy watching the C's game but I glanced at the score and it didn't look good.  What a great surprise.  The Heat apparently put together a 38 to 17 4th quarter.