Author Topic: Would you trade #16 + #23 + #31 + #35 for [bust]?  (Read 4213 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Would you trade #16 + #23 + #31 + #35 for [bust]?
« Reply #15 on: June 14, 2016, 10:15:17 PM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469
Alex Len (probably not available), Lucas Noguiera, McBuckets, TJ Warren.

TJ's a guy I really liked coming out of college.  I think he'd be a great candidate for the kind of thing LB33 is talking about.
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: Would you trade #16 + #23 + #31 + #35 for [bust]?
« Reply #16 on: June 14, 2016, 10:17:25 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
Okafor is the only one that blatantly comes to mind, and is someone I know for a fact can do better. I also think we can get Jabari Parker, and believe he will be knocking down the 3, if we are willing to give IT and possibly AB. Then if Hield drops to #6 and if he really is JJ Redick but bigger, longer, stronger, and quicker then I think he is most getable if we are willing to trade Crowder for the #6 and a future first from the Pelicans.

And next years draft is very good....Dennis Smith Jr and Bam Bam are nasty

Which is why I absolutely do not want us to trade the 2017 brooklyn right to swap. I think players in the 3-5 range next year could be as good as #1 and #2 this year.
Yeah from what i hear 2016 is a bit of a dud, but 2017 might be a pretty solid draft.  We'll want to hang onto that pick swap just in case Brooklyn fails to make improvements this Summer.  Could be looking at a pretty significant piece there.

Re: Would you trade #16 + #23 + #31 + #35 for [bust]?
« Reply #17 on: June 14, 2016, 10:18:31 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
Alex Len (probably not available), Lucas Noguiera, McBuckets, TJ Warren.

TJ's a guy I really liked coming out of college.  I think he'd be a great candidate for the kind of thing LB33 is talking about.
Alex Len and McBuckets are solid ideas.  TP.

They both started to show their potential, tho.  They look like guys who will have pretty solid careers.

Re: Would you trade #16 + #23 + #31 + #35 for [bust]?
« Reply #18 on: June 14, 2016, 10:22:06 PM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469
Alex Len (probably not available), Lucas Noguiera, McBuckets, TJ Warren.

TJ's a guy I really liked coming out of college.  I think he'd be a great candidate for the kind of thing LB33 is talking about.
Alex Len and McBuckets are solid ideas.  TP.

They both started to show their potential, tho.  They look like guys who will have pretty solid careers.

What?  You don't like the other two?
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: Would you trade #16 + #23 + #31 + #35 for [bust]?
« Reply #19 on: June 14, 2016, 10:28:24 PM »

Offline alldaboston

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4170
  • Tommy Points: 324
I like Hezonja still. I think in the right situation he can be a good NBA player.

I also like Warren and McBuckets too.
I could very well see the Hawks... starting Taurean Prince at the 3, who is already better than Crowder, imo.

you vs. the guy she tells you not to worry about

Re: Would you trade #16 + #23 + #31 + #35 for [bust]?
« Reply #20 on: June 14, 2016, 10:30:08 PM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469
Jeremy Lamb?  Evan Fournier?
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: Would you trade #16 + #23 + #31 + #35 for [bust]?
« Reply #21 on: June 14, 2016, 10:40:58 PM »

Offline Future Celtics Owner

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3097
  • Tommy Points: 191
  • Celtic's only raise championship Banners
Okafor is the only one that blatantly comes to mind, and is someone I know for a fact can do better. I also think we can get Jabari Parker, and believe he will be knocking down the 3, if we are willing to give IT and possibly AB. Then if Hield drops to #6 and if he really is JJ Redick but bigger, longer, stronger, and quicker then I think he is most getable if we are willing to trade Crowder for the #6 and a future first from the Pelicans.

And next years draft is very good....Dennis Smith Jr and Bam Bam are nasty

Which is why I absolutely do not want us to trade the 2017 brooklyn right to swap. I think players in the 3-5 range next year could be as good as #1 and #2 this year.
Yeah from what i hear 2016 is a bit of a dud, but 2017 might be a pretty solid draft.  We'll want to hang onto that pick swap just in case Brooklyn fails to make improvements this Summer.  Could be looking at a pretty significant piece there.
To make things fair I only pick guys that are ranked not in the top 3 of the draft usually. Check out Dennis Smith Jr and Bam Bam

Re: Would you trade #16 + #23 + #31 + #35 for [bust]?
« Reply #22 on: June 14, 2016, 11:06:54 PM »

Offline trickybilly

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5600
  • Tommy Points: 618
I vaguely remember Kidd-Gilchrist having a nice run before injuries...
"Gimme the ball, gimme the ball". Freddy Quimby, 1994.

Re: Would you trade #16 + #23 + #31 + #35 for [bust]?
« Reply #23 on: June 14, 2016, 11:18:42 PM »

Online DefenseWinsChamps

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6048
  • Tommy Points: 766
Derrick Williams, Meyers Leonard, Ben McLemore, Tony Snell, Kyle O'Quinn

Re: Would you trade #16 + #23 + #31 + #35 for [bust]?
« Reply #24 on: June 14, 2016, 11:59:57 PM »

Offline loco_91

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2087
  • Tommy Points: 145
This is a deep draft, and I'm convinced that there will be good prospects available through the early 2nd round. I view #16+23+31+35 combined as being as valuable as the #6 pick in this draft. So that's a no, I wouldn't even consider a trade of this nature.

Re: Would you trade #16 + #23 + #31 + #35 for [bust]?
« Reply #25 on: June 15, 2016, 12:02:13 AM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
I vaguely remember Kidd-Gilchrist having a nice run before injuries...
yeah actually he was one of the best defenders in the league

Re: Would you trade #16 + #23 + #31 + #35 for [bust]?
« Reply #26 on: June 15, 2016, 01:02:16 AM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8826
  • Tommy Points: 289
I can see DA getting Otto Porter

Re: Would you trade #16 + #23 + #31 + #35 for [bust]?
« Reply #27 on: June 15, 2016, 01:20:46 AM »

Offline byennie

  • Webmaster
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2572
  • Tommy Points: 3033
I think McBuckets fit the profile the best, but I would definitely not trade 2x 1st rounders and 2 picks nearly as valuable for him. I could see maybe #23 and a 2nd rounder, considering he's been a bit of a disappointment.

Then see just how far his shooting can take him, as he seems at least capable of a JJ Redick type career where he hits 45% 3PT on high volume from deep with average defense. Not what I'd expect, but I'd take a 20% chance of that for #23.