we take Rose off their hands , keep him or move him.
bottom line we get butler and a piece to keep or move
Bottom line that is an idiotic trade idea because Rose isn't a piece to "keep or move". He's a piece you're stuck with until his contract is up (thankfully next year) aka Vin Baker or Raef LaFrentz.
IT is at least as good as Butler on the offensive end of the floor (PER 36 works well here):
IT: 24.8 ppg / 3.3 rpg / 6.9 apg / .562 TS%
Butler: 20.4 / 5.2 / 4.7 / .562 TS%
So the only advantage to Butler is position and defensive end of the floor. While significant, that's not huge especially when you factor in IT's significant difference in salary. Call this part a medium edge to Chicago - and that's being generous to them.
Then you're also sending over Bradley (1st Team Defense + low salary) and JJ/Amir (both whose non-guaranteed salaries are worth something) for an oft-injured Rose. I wouldn't make that trade straight up. Rose is a high-priced shell of his former self, scored only 1 ppg more than Bradley and was absolutely horrid last season. While Chicago had a winning record, the difference between Rose's Ortg and Drtg was NEGATIVE 14. His +/- was -3.3. He was -.7 in VORP, which means he was worse than a replacement player! Rose is now the kind of player who gets moved for a top-55 protected 2nd round pick, not for a 1st team defensive stud on a below-market contract.
Then you want to give up 3 + 16 for 14? You only do this deal without any picks, never mind giving up the #3 in the draft. This trade isn't remotely close for the Cs. People need to look past names of washed-up players and look at their current on-the-court play.